Ohio State vs Penn State Offensive Foul Thoughts? (Video)

[acgod24]

Thoughts on this call???? That's bad at any level

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/ncaab-...004334735.html

[deecee]

I thought the foul was called on red. If it's on white, then I have no idea what the ref saw. Maybe he didn't like JoePa?

[Raymond]

As I posted a few weeks ago, another call where an official allows himself to get fooled by blowing a whistle on the feigned reaction of a player, instead of actually seeing the contact.

[acgod24]

The foul was on the white player. Obviously #23 Red pushes the guy on purpose to prevent the breakaway.

[JRutledge]

Not only that, I felt it was a flop or embellishment on the PSU player. But if anything I am going to call, it would have been a FF1 on the OSU player. Just wow I guess.

Peace

[crosscountry55]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

Not only that, I felt it was a flop or embellishment on the PSU player. But if anything I am going to call, it would have been a FF1 on the OSU player. Just wow I guess.

Peace

This brings up a good point. Ignoring the bad call, what do you do here when you observe the shove by Red? The breakaway player was not yet in the act of shooting, but he's got a clear path to a highlight-reel dunk.

For me, if it's not flagrant, no call. But....it's a clear attempt to make the ball dead before the try begins, so reluctantly I have to call a F1 here (intentional in NFHS). I would hope for PSU that two shots and the ball would garner at least if not more points than a single breakaway field goal.

Other thoughts?

I think the official called the foul for the offensive player sliding into the defenders path illegally screening him. The shove by the defender was a reaction to getting screened off.

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by crosscountry55

This brings up a good point. Ignoring the bad call, what do you do here when you observe the shove by Red? The breakaway player was not yet in the act of shooting, but he's got a clear path to a highlight-reel dunk.

For me, if it's not flagrant, no call. But....it's a clear attempt to make the ball dead before the try begins, so reluctantly I have to call a F1 here (intentional in NFHS). I would hope for PSU that two shots and the ball would garner at least if not more points than a single breakaway field goal.

Other thoughts?

If I blow the whistle to call a foul on Red, then it has to be FF1/Intentional.

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by crosscountry55

But....it's a clear attempt to make the ball dead before the try begins, so reluctantly I have to call a F1 here (intentional in NFHS).

Disagree that "it's a clear attempt to make the ball dead".

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

As I posted a few weeks ago, another call where an official allows himself to get fooled by blowing a whistle on the feigned reaction of a player, instead of actually seeing the contact.

Apparently, the foul was called on the player doing the reacting....even worse.

[JRutledge]

Embedded for better viewing.

Peace