Notre Dame/Clemson (Video)

[Thumper68]

1. Correct. I think is looking at the "c" for a tipped ball signal.
2. Nothing
3. Foul

On the initial shot before #3, look at the rebounding action on the lane line table side. Blue #22 holding? Intentional for fed rule set?

[APG]

Originally Posted by Thumper68

On the initial shot before #3, look at the rebounding action on the lane line table side. Blue #22 holding? Intentional for fed rule set?

Absolutely not

[johnny d]

Originally Posted by thumper68

on the initial shot before #3, look at the rebounding action on the lane line table side. Blue #22 holding? Intentional for fed rule set?

no

Originally Posted by Thumper68

On the initial shot before #3, look at the rebounding action on the lane line table side. Blue #22 holding? Intentional for fed rule set?

Could be holding, no way that's an INT though.

[j51969]

[QUOTE=Thumper68;955197]1. Correct. I think is looking at the "c" for a tipped ball signal.

+1

I don't believe it was late at all. He was clearly looking for imformation before he make a call. Wierd angle and the C may have seen something he didn't. Once the C had nothing he put air in it.

[Zoochy]

Play #3
I had similar play where I called a foul. Coach comments "That can't be a foul. He was going for the ball!"
Coaches say funny things.

[La Rikardo]

Originally Posted by Zoochy

Play #3
I had similar play where I called a foul. Coach comments "That can't be a foul. He was going for the ball!"
Coaches say funny things.

We hear that line in soccer every single game.

Originally Posted by La Rikardo

We hear that line in soccer every single game.

Probably cuz at the highest levels of soccer, getting any of the ball means 99% of the time there wasn't a foul.