What say you on this dunk? (Video)

Originally Posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.

There is no such thing as a no call either you judged that there was an infraction of the rules or there was an infraction of the rules.

Wtf? We're done here Mark.

[Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.]

Originally Posted by AremRed

Wtf? We're done here Mark.

I assume that you know who Peter Webb is. Peter Webb would ask you the very same question. A no call implies that there was an infraction of the rules but the officials decided not to call it.

Therefore why did not feel that there was no infraction by either the offensive player or the defensive player.

MTD, Sr.

Originally Posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.

I assume that you know who Peter Webb is. Peter Webb would ask you the very same question. A no call implies that there was an infraction of the rules but the officials decided not to call it.

No, but by your description he sounds like the kind of asshøle official who would insist on "only using rulebook language."

Originally Posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.

Therefore why did not feel that there was no infraction by either the offensive player or the defensive player.

Is that a question?

[APG]

Originally Posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.

I assume that you know who Peter Webb is. Peter Webb would ask you the very same question. A no call implies that there was an infraction of the rules but the officials decided not to call it.

Therefore why did not feel that there was no infraction by either the offensive player or the defensive player.

MTD, Sr.

A no call implies he wouldn't put a whistle on the play...period. You can have a no call for a variety of reasons...those reasons can be valid or not valid. You've been around this forum long enough to know that

[Adam]

Originally Posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.

I assume that you know who Peter Webb is. Peter Webb would ask you the very same question. A no call implies that there was an infraction of the rules but the officials decided not to call it.

Therefore why did not feel that there was no infraction by either the offensive player or the defensive player.

MTD, Sr.

Mark, to the rest of us, a "no call" means there's nothing to call.

[fullor30]

Originally Posted by Adam

Mark, to the rest of us, a "no call" means there's nothing to call.

Since we seem to be really into semantics on this thread....

"Therefore, how can there not be a whistle and a foul: either a PC by the dunker or a block by the defender? And there was contact between the two players involved."


I didn't know contact by definition was a foul?

[Brad]

Originally Posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.

A no call implies that there was an infraction of the rules but the officials decided not to call it.

No … that is a missed call.

A “no call” in officiating vernacular means “I don’t have a call on that play” … or, in a way you might prefer, “I judged that there was not an infraction of the rules”

This is pretty much accepted by everyone.

[SC Official]

I'm much more concerned about the blatant taunt that was not penalized than I am about the possibility of a PC foul. That was as obvious as it gets, and three officials missed it. No excuse for that IMO. We would get blasted in South Carolina if we didn't call that.

[griblets]

The taunting T is easy, and we all seem to agree.

I'm surprised that so many would no call on the dunk. If I had a knee hit the left side of my face, I'd jerk to the right, too. I've watched several times, and I just can't see passing on PC.

[fullor30]

Originally Posted by griblets

The taunting T is easy, and we all seem to agree.

I'm surprised that so many would no call on the dunk. If I had a knee hit the left side of my face, I'd jerk to the right, too. I've watched several times, and I just can't see passing on PC.

Watch again