![]() |
Illegal Screen? (Video)
Would you have an illegal screen either at the top of the key or on the block (this screen you will need to piece together since the camera view changes):
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/twbmjKhWbvE" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> |
Close, but no. Defender wasn't going anywhere.
|
Quote:
Legal screen. MTD, Sr. |
No and no.
This is one of those calls that if you make it in the first quarter, now you've gotta make it all night. Conversely, the fourth quarter shouldn't be the first time you call it, either, if you haven't been calling it consistently throughout. If I hold this whistle, my crew and I are primed to sell a more egregious IS later when we need to. |
Legal
|
No. The screener did not prevent the defender from doing anything or displace him.
Peace |
Legal..
Legal screen...no true displacement.
On a more important note, I'm firing the director of the telecast...don't cut from a high-angle shot to that baseline garbage mid-play!!! |
At the top of the key...no. It looked entirely legal to me.
The one on the low block....doesn't look like it but really don't have enough of the play in the clip from the right angles to tell for sure. |
I got nothing at top of key, but would definitely be leaning towards a yes on the low block.
|
Quote:
|
No on the high screen, and absolutely a suspicious play on the low screen. I'd like to have seen more of that low action to know for sure, but from what was visible, I can see a call being made and would support it.
|
Maybe on the low block, but I'm not convinced.
Shirts are growing on me for some reason. |
The low screen looked suspect. That would be a tough one to see with the swing pass though.
|
Is the upper screen considered to have met the the requirement in 4-40-5 for screening a moving opponent, that a "normal step or stride" was allowed by the screener's position?
|
I have "nothing".
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:47pm. |