The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   Differences of Opinion (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/98814-differences-opinion.html)

Nevadaref Thu Dec 11, 2014 04:26pm

How's this Freddy?
That situation is not a violation BY RULE.

Freddy Thu Dec 11, 2014 05:35pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nevadaref (Post 946514)
How's this Freddy?
That situation is not a violation BY RULE.

If your response had a "Like" button I would click on it.
But those who answered accordingly on our state's rules test got it wrong.

AremRed Thu Dec 11, 2014 10:26pm

If I can't point to the rule or case play in the current year's books, I'm not following it.

BillyMac Fri Dec 12, 2014 07:26am

Ignorance Is Bliss (Thomas Gray) ...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AremRed (Post 946541)
If I can't point to the rule or case play in the current year's books, I'm not following it.

There are a lot of important, but very specific, caseplays out there. It's one thing for an inexperienced official not knowing about them, but it's another thing for an experienced official, who knows the specific case play, to intentionally ignore these one-time-published-somewhere-official caseplays.

I recall that it took several years for the prohibition against lights in shoes to show up in the rulebook and/or casebook, but once it showed up as an annual interpretation, with no other rulebook, and/or casebook citation, I enforced it.

Rich Fri Dec 12, 2014 07:55am

Quote:

Originally Posted by AremRed (Post 946541)
If I can't point to the rule or case play in the current year's books, I'm not following it.

The interpretations just don't disappear after a given year. And there's a list every season -- they don't all end up in the rule/case book.

AremRed Fri Dec 12, 2014 08:21am

Quote:

Originally Posted by BillyMac (Post 946576)
There are a lot of important, but very specific, caseplays out there. It's one thing for an inexperienced official not knowing about them, but it's another thing for an experienced official, who knows the specific case play, to intentionally ignore these one-time-published-somewhere-official caseplays.

I recall that it took several years for the prohibition against lights in shoes to show up in the rulebook and/or casebook, but once it showed up as an annual interpretation, with no other rulebook, and/or casebook citation, I enforced it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rich (Post 946577)
The interpretations just don't disappear after a given year. And there's a list every season -- they don't all end up in the rule/case book.

Thanks for your advice guys!


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:02pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1