VT vs PSU - 1 and 1 or not? VIDEO
 

Here's a situation where it appears only ONE player on BOTH teams realizes the situation......

On the second, wide angle view, notice the officials reaction. It's easy to see the L and T's reaction, and the C holds his hands up later indicating one and one. Kinda bizarre.

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/ncaab-...030152074.html

seems to me the L official steps in to administer what he believes to me another FT:eek:

By what I see, especially the Lead stepping into the paint, it doesn't appear the crew was treating it as a one-and-one. The C indicating one-and-one after the fact doesn't really help.

Isn't the official administering the first throw supposed to indicate whether it is one, one-and-one, or two shots? If that official signals two, and it was supposed to be one-and-one, does the ball become live (because it was supposed to be one-and-one) or go to a possession arrow (becasue the official told the players it would be dead)?

FED: It depends on how many players react which way.

Fed Case Book 8.6.1 deals with erroneous info given by the official(s), and says that if either team is placed at a disadvantage, because of the erroneous info, the ball should be blown dead, immediately, and an AP throw-in be awarded.

Now, if the official's info was correct, and only one player from either team was paying attention, well, I'm not sure you can fix that . . .

I'd like to see the play that preceded this.

Ninja edit: I watched the play. It was a rebounding foul, no tap, should have been 1 and 1. Almost guarantee the Lead screwed this up by telling everyone two shots.

Well we can definitely hear the announcer in the background announce 1 and 1.