Arizona / SDSU Screening Action (Video)

[griblets]

I've been lurking for the past couple months, but this is my first post. For someone returning to officiating after 16 years, this forum has proved to be a very good resource for me. Thank you.

Screening is the topic for this video request, specifically, back to back plays just inside 9:00 left in the first half. At the 9:46 mark, #3 white sets a screen at outside the 3 point arc. Go no call or illegal? On the ensuing possession, at the 8:37 mark, #21 red sets a screen just outside the top of the key. Same question, good no call or illegal?

I have illegal screens on both. Because of no calls like these, I feel like screening is going to be a point of emphasis in the coming year(s).

Comments on the plays and screening in general?

[Nevadaref]

I'm watching this game, but don't recall the specific screens that you mention.
FYI the high screen at the top of the key often leading to a pick and roll was an NCAA point of emphasis about two seasons ago. The video made particular note of big post players coming up to set these picks.

[APG]

Your times were off...I hope these were the screens you wanted to take another look at...

[bob jenkins]

1) Might have been a little wide, but the first contact was in the torso and after that the defense got around the screen with little difficulty.

2) No contact, no foul.

Play 1: Marginal at that level.

Play 2: No contact, no foul.

[JRutledge]

1: I saw no displacement. The defender just went around the screen more than there was contact.

2: Absolutely no contact.

Peace

[rockyroad]

Gotta agree with the others here...first screen there was really no delay of the defender, so no whistle really needed. Second play, there was no contact at all.