The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   Gender Wars.... (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/98670-gender-wars.html)

DRJ1960 Wed Nov 19, 2014 04:40pm

Gender Wars....
 
Our Association has been instructed by the schools not to send female officials to do boys varsity contests. (Yes, males are allowed to work girls games).

Discuss....

Smitty Wed Nov 19, 2014 04:52pm

Our association has several women who work boys games, at the highest level. Our association is also the first in Texas to have a female official work the boys state finals. She's damn good. Times are changing. Your association seems to be going the other way.

Welpe Wed Nov 19, 2014 04:52pm

I hope the first thing your association does is send three women to work their next BV game. :rolleyes:

Sharpshooternes Wed Nov 19, 2014 04:53pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Welpe (Post 944129)
I hope the first thing your association does is send three women to work their next BV game. :rolleyes:

Agree.

SC Official Wed Nov 19, 2014 04:53pm

Ridiculous. Is there any way that the state high school league can intervene?

Some of the top-rated officials in my state are females. We've had females work boys state championships before.

And I agree with the above posters.

jTheUmp Wed Nov 19, 2014 05:00pm

I didn't realize that possession of specific genitalia was a requirement to officiate boys basketball.

Is this just a couple of schools, or is it an entire conference (or worse)?

Either way, that's seriously messed up...

BigCat Wed Nov 19, 2014 05:30pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by DRJ1960 (Post 944122)
Our Association has been instructed by the schools not to send female officials to do boys varsity contests. (Yes, males are allowed to work girls games).

Discuss....

Ask whomever told you this to put that request in writing and to identify the schools that are part of the request by name because you want to contact them directly. . request a meeting immediately to discuss because your association feels this is outrageous. you assign referees not men or women….

1. they probably won't do either. but the point is to let somebody on their end know this isn't going to go away.
2. if they list the schools, send it to each school board identified and ask them if this is truly the position of this district in 2014….
3. also mail it to local newspaper and tv station.

Schedule your season as you normally would. don't load them up with women but don't change for their benefit. if they turn woman away see number 3. good luck.

Camron Rust Wed Nov 19, 2014 05:42pm

Just turn the request over to your local TV station. That should fix that.

Or, send 3 male officials from your rookie class...3 that really don't know what is going on yet. When they call to complain, tell them you had 3 highly qualified women that could have worked the game but they asked for men. :D

Freddy Wed Nov 19, 2014 05:45pm

More Info Needed
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DRJ1960 (Post 944122)
Our Association has been instructed by the schools not to send female officials to do boys varsity contests. (Yes, males are allowed to work girls games). Discuss....

A. Objectively speaking, how do the individual women of your association rank in terms of skill and ability in comparison to all officials?

B. Is it correct that your association assigns officials solely based on aptitude and merit?

Answers to these questions are significant for a worthwhile discussion. Otherwise the whole thing becomes nothing more than a politically correct exercise in feel-goodism.

Rich Wed Nov 19, 2014 05:58pm

Being instructed to do something and actually doing it are two different things.

SC Official Wed Nov 19, 2014 06:03pm

In South Carolina, officials typically work a doubleheader (girls game followed by a boys game), so a request like that would not only be denied, but infeasible. Our state would say that if you don't want certain officials, put them on your mark-off list in Arbiter. But if you fill it up with females, then you're risking getting assigned some of the lower-tier males. It's really that simple.

I do like the suggestion of turning it over to the media.

Adam Wed Nov 19, 2014 06:11pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by DRJ1960 (Post 944122)
Our Association has been instructed by the schools not to send female officials to do boys varsity contests. (Yes, males are allowed to work girls games).

Discuss....

Tell the schools to take a hike and welcome them to 1992.

If you want to have some real fun, have one of the female officials in your association contact an attorney. I'll bet the attorney would take this one for free, and it would be a very quick return.

There are so many options here.

Mark Padgett Wed Nov 19, 2014 07:14pm

Contact your local chapter of the ACLU. They'll love to take on this fight for you and probably at no charge.

JRutledge Wed Nov 19, 2014 07:30pm

All I can say is that it is very uncommon that any female works a boys basketball game at the varsity level. But on the flip side women get a lot of great opportunities and girls or NCAAW basketball usually faster than men at the same level of experience or opportunities. And it is not uncommon either that anyone that works a lot of girls do not get a lot of boys opportunities either in the regular season or post season. So I guess it would be hard here to complain of who you send to a game.

Peace

justacoach Wed Nov 19, 2014 10:40pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by SC Official (Post 944131)
Ridiculous. Is there any way that the state high school league can intervene?

The VA head poobah for HS basketball is named Joyce!!

Raymond Wed Nov 19, 2014 11:05pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by DRJ1960 (Post 944122)
Our Association has been instructed by the schools not to send female officials to do boys varsity contests. (Yes, males are allowed to work girls games).

Discuss....

Forward that correspondence to Joyce and see how quickly it gets handled.

and if any of those schools make the state quarterfinals, best believe Joyce will send one or two females to their game.

TimTaylor Wed Nov 19, 2014 11:06pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by welpe (Post 944129)
i hope the first thing your association does is send three women to work their next bv game. :rolleyes:

+100

Adam Wed Nov 19, 2014 11:24pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by justacoach (Post 944151)
The VA head poobah for HS basketball is named Joyce!!

Well that's a funny na... Wait, never mind. I get it.

JetMetFan Wed Nov 19, 2014 11:24pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Welpe (Post 944129)
I hope the first thing your association does is send three women to work their next BV game. :rolleyes:

I'm with this. When schools forfeit games after refusing to play due to the makeup of the crews the nonsense will stop.

Also, depending upon how your pay system works, I would remind those schools that they will pay the crew at the full rate if the schools refuse to play. Let them go argue that one out in court.

Lcubed48 Thu Nov 20, 2014 08:10am

Quote:

Originally Posted by DRJ1960 (Post 944122)
Our Association has been instructed by the schools not to send female officials to do boys varsity contests. (Yes, males are allowed to work girls games).

Discuss....

All of your schools or just some of them?

Rich Thu Nov 20, 2014 08:26am

Quote:

Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 944145)
All I can say is that it is very uncommon that any female works a boys basketball game at the varsity level. But on the flip side women get a lot of great opportunities and girls or NCAAW basketball usually faster than men at the same level of experience or opportunities. And it is not uncommon either that anyone that works a lot of girls do not get a lot of boys opportunities either in the regular season or post season. So I guess it would be hard here to complain of who you send to a game.

Peace

I would not hesitate to assign women to a game. And a coach telling me this would get a response of "are you serious?" followed by a crew of three women.

And yes, I assign varsity basketball for 20 schools. With women on staff that work boys games.

zm1283 Thu Nov 20, 2014 09:40am

If women are good enough to work in the NBA and college football, they're good enough to work high school basketball games.

Adam Thu Nov 20, 2014 11:19am

I cannot express enough how badly I want to know how this turns out.

JRutledge Thu Nov 20, 2014 11:47am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rich (Post 944168)
I would not hesitate to assign women to a game. And a coach telling me this would get a response of "are you serious?" followed by a crew of three women.

And yes, I assign varsity basketball for 20 schools. With women on staff that work boys games.

And that is fine and how it should be, but because of how many women get college opportunties, it is really a matter of availablity as anything. I just spoke with one of my female officiating friends and she could give a darn about HS games. And when she does work, she almost does not know the diffferences. As you have seen here, those that work Women's college basketball often think highly of their level and seem to think everything is done correctly at that level. So if those do not make themselves available. And when the check is greater and the opportunity is more realistic, at least here they do not stick around to work those levels very long. But I would work with a good woman official over a bad male official any day. And I also think many of them do not want the hassel of what it can bring either. And yes, it would be somewhat of a hassel for them if they are already coming into a situation with those attitudes of females working those games.

Peace

Raymond Thu Nov 20, 2014 12:07pm

One thing: In Virginia if these are private schools, there is nothing the state body (VHSL) can do.

DRJ1960 Thu Nov 20, 2014 01:06pm

Assuming (I have seen no written documentation from the schools)

[a] the communication was "back channel"... ie nothing written down... and
[b] knowing the implied threat of losing contracts (There is a larger, well respected BB Association in our area who would be glad to replace us).

Would we continue to "poke the bear" and lose our Association or would we knuckle under?

BNR--- These are VHSL schools

Raymond Thu Nov 20, 2014 01:13pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by DRJ1960 (Post 944189)
Assuming (I have seen no written documentation from the schools)

[a] the communication was "back channel"... ie nothing written down... and
[b] knowing the implied threat of losing contracts (There is a larger, well respected BB Association in our area who would be glad to replace us).

Would we continue to "poke the bear" and lose our Association or would we knuckle under?

BNR--- These are VHSL schools

Being that I am in the other association, I would hope (and do believe) our leadership has the integrity not to even have that on the table during any negotiation.

DRJ1960 Thu Nov 20, 2014 02:04pm

BNR, Lcubed48 and any others from your group,

My apologies for any slight of your group. I do not have ANY reason to have anything but respect for what you guys do. It is simply a fact of life for us that you are where our customers go if they become dissatisfied (Ft Lee Christmas tourney, Lawson Classic, for example).

Raymond Thu Nov 20, 2014 02:22pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by DRJ1960 (Post 944198)
BNR, Lcubed48 and any others from your group,

My apologies for any slight of your group. I do not have ANY reason to have anything but respect for what you guys do. It is simply a fact of life for us that you are where our customers go if they become dissatisfied (Ft Lee Christmas tourney, Lawson Classic, for example).

Oh, I'm not taking it as a slight, just as a matter of fact.

If I were your association I wouldn't let the schools try to strong-arm you with this tactic.

Believe me, I know all too well what these schools around here are capable of doing/saying "off the record". It's the reason I ref public schools in Richmond instead of my local area.

Adam Thu Nov 20, 2014 03:00pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 944183)
And that is fine and how it should be, but because of how many women get college opportunties, it is really a matter of availablity as anything. I just spoke with one of my female officiating friends and she could give a darn about HS games. And when she does work, she almost does not know the diffferences. As you have seen here, those that work Women's college basketball often think highly of their level and seem to think everything is done correctly at that level. So if those do not make themselves available. And when the check is greater and the opportunity is more realistic, at least here they do not stick around to work those levels very long. But I would work with a good woman official over a bad male official any day. And I also think many of them do not want the hassel of what it can bring either. And yes, it would be somewhat of a hassel for them if they are already coming into a situation with those attitudes of females working those games.
Peace

I highlighted the irrelevant parts.

JRutledge Thu Nov 20, 2014 03:22pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adam (Post 944203)
I highlighted the irrelevant parts.

That is not irrelevant. It is a real issue. Because around here, it would be hard to find 3 female officials that are available to work many HS games.

Peace

HawkeyeCubP Thu Nov 20, 2014 03:30pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 944205)
That is not irrelevant. It is a real issue. Because around here, it would be hard to find 3 female officials that are available to work many HS games.

Peace

With all due respect, the same argument (gauging interest in a vaccuum, etc.) could be and has been made in regard to the traditionally underrepresented gender in (insert anything here). (-See pre-1972 for anti-Title IX arguments; e.g. "We'd be hard pressed to find 6 teams with enough participants to field a girls' league, therefore, this isn't really an issue in these parts.")

jTheUmp Thu Nov 20, 2014 03:32pm

IMHO, it doesn't really matter if your association (or mine, or anyone's) has 3 female officials available to work a particular game in a particular place on a particular night.

What matters is the fact that one or more schools (or individual administrators in those schools) would even make this request, even "off the record." It's 2014, not 1914...

Adam Thu Nov 20, 2014 04:10pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 944205)
That is not irrelevant. It is a real issue. Because around here, it would be hard to find 3 female officials that are available to work many HS games.

Peace

My point is it's not at all relevant to whether the request noted in the OP is reasonable, absurd, or somewhere in between. The actual availability of the officials doesn't matter to the schools making the stupid request.

just another ref Thu Nov 20, 2014 04:43pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adam (Post 944211)
My point is it's not at all relevant to whether the request noted in the OP is reasonable, absurd, or somewhere in between. The actual availability of the officials doesn't matter to the schools making the stupid request.

On a related note, what percentage of most of our HS associations if female? This year my association has been combined with (absorbed by) a larger association. I'm not sure, but I think we have about 3 women out of a total of 90 who are available to work varsity. With that in mind, it's hard to imagine a school asking for no females, because they would get one so seldom anyway. Just put the women on the cut list if you feel they are unqualified.

JRutledge Thu Nov 20, 2014 04:44pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adam (Post 944211)
My point is it's not at all relevant to whether the request noted in the OP is reasonable, absurd, or somewhere in between. The actual availability of the officials doesn't matter to the schools making the stupid request.

I looked at the largest association I belong to and out of well over 200 officials, we only have 5 females that appear to be members. About 3 of those are college officials. I know of one that has very little experience, let alone varsity experience of any kind. And that is the highest number of female officials that I know of in any of my 3 basketball associations. There are two that attend I know of in another association. I mentioned this because it would be very hard here to send a lot of women officials to any level. When they get a college opportunity, they leave high school.

Peace

JRutledge Thu Nov 20, 2014 04:49pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by HawkeyeCubP (Post 944208)
With all due respect, the same argument (gauging interest in a vaccuum, etc.) could be and has been made in regard to the traditionally underrepresented gender in (insert anything here). (-See pre-1972 for anti-Title IX arguments; e.g. "We'd be hard pressed to find 6 teams with enough participants to field a girls' league, therefore, this isn't really an issue in these parts.")

Officiating and finding officials are two different things. I run a new official's class every year and I am lucky if one women even attends the class.

Men, who did not play, who did not even have an athletic background get into officiating a lot more than a big time female athlete that might have coached, we cannot get them into the ranks. I can hardly think of 10 females in my area that work a heavy high school schedule. Almost all of them work college ball.

Peace

johnny d Thu Nov 20, 2014 04:56pm

I understand the point JRut is trying to make. I also understand that it might not be completely relevant to the discussion. I think a more relevant point, at least where me and JRut work is that most coaches and players do not like to have officials that work both boys/mens and girls/womens sides working their games regardless of gender. On this point I happen to agree. I realize it is the norm in some areas to work both genders. That is definitely not the case here. Additionally, I think the official that can work both genders well is few and far between. Officiating like playing is a matter of practice and repetition. No matter what the political correctness police would have you believe, there is a big difference between how the mens and womens games are played, and the expectations of what is and isn't going to be called. Because of those differences, I find the few games each season I have to work with someone that does both genders (HS or college) to be the least comfortable games I have each season. I can completely understand why a coach or team would not want these officials on their games. Now if the female official works all or mostly mens games, then I do not see a problem.

JRutledge Thu Nov 20, 2014 05:15pm

It is relevant if you send female (or male) officials that do not have experience working boys basketball. And I bet that was part of the problem in this case. And that is also why many that work deep in the girls playoffs here, do not work deep in the boys playoffs (and vice versa). There are men that work the girls game and do not have respect for the game and do not call what is expected even with a lot of experience. And there are officials that have very little boys basketball experience and are in over their heads when working those games.

Peace

Raymond Thu Nov 20, 2014 05:29pm

what is relevant in Virginia is that the head of the VHSL has made it clear that gender should not play any part in assigning boys or girls games.

Camron Rust Thu Nov 20, 2014 05:45pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by DRJ1960 (Post 944189)
Assuming (I have seen no written documentation from the schools)

[a] the communication was "back channel"... ie nothing written down... and
[b] knowing the implied threat of losing contracts (There is a larger, well respected BB Association in our area who would be glad to replace us).

Would we continue to "poke the bear" and lose our Association or would we knuckle under?

BNR--- These are VHSL schools

And this is one of many reasons why schools shouldn't have the ability to more or less arbitrarily choose their association. It is basically a conflict of interest. It should be managed by the state or regional organization.

Here, schools are assigned by the state to each organization based on geography. Those on the bordering areas and request for a change but they have to have a good reason. New organizations can and do form but it keeps most of the underhandedness out of it.

If there is a real problem, then the schools can get a change, but they have to justify it.

Adam Fri Nov 21, 2014 09:38am

Quote:

Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 944217)
I looked at the largest association I belong to and out of well over 200 officials, we only have 5 females that appear to be members. About 3 of those are college officials. I know of one that has very little experience, let alone varsity experience of any kind. And that is the highest number of female officials that I know of in any of my 3 basketball associations. There are two that attend I know of in another association. I mentioned this because it would be very hard here to send a lot of women officials to any level. When they get a college opportunity, they leave high school.

Peace

Not at all relevant to whether a school could, or should, make the request in the OP.

Adam Fri Nov 21, 2014 09:40am

Quote:

Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 944221)
It is relevant if you send female (or male) officials that do not have experience working boys basketball. And I bet that was part of the problem in this case. And that is also why many that work deep in the girls playoffs here, do not work deep in the boys playoffs (and vice versa). There are men that work the girls game and do not have respect for the game and do not call what is expected even with a lot of experience. And there are officials that have very little boys basketball experience and are in over their heads when working those games.

Peace

If that was the problem, then they could easily request, in writing, to have more experienced officials. That would solve any real problems. The fact that they've gone through back channels with an implied threat of hiring a different association tells me otherwise.

JRutledge Fri Nov 21, 2014 09:42am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adam (Post 944276)
Not at all relevant to whether a school could, or should, make the request in the OP.

We discuss a lot of things that are not just about the OP. And considering that none of us have seen the letter or the correspondence, we really should not comment at all if that is the standard.

Peace

JRutledge Fri Nov 21, 2014 09:44am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adam (Post 944278)
If that was the problem, then they could easily request, in writing, to have more experienced officials. That would solve any real problems. The fact that they've gone through back channels with an implied threat of hiring a different association tells me otherwise.

Yes they could and unless we see the actual letter or hear the comments, we are speculating what was actually said here. I was just sharing that it would be hard to do what people suggested if they wanted to send 3 female official to a game of any kind. Just like it would be hard to get 3 male officials together unless you know they are willing to work together on a specific day.

Peace

BoomerSooner Fri Nov 21, 2014 02:24pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by jTheUmp (Post 944209)
IMHO, it doesn't really matter if your association (or mine, or anyone's) has 3 female officials available to work a particular game in a particular place on a particular night.

What matters is the fact that one or more schools (or individual administrators in those schools) would even make this request, even "off the record." It's 2014, not 1914...

Why do we, myself included, still make this statement??? I was reading it and clicked to me that the type of thinking that we're discussing was just as wrong in 1914 as it is in 2014. It was accepted much more widely then, but so was slavery in 1814. That didn't make slavery right then either. The problem isn't that people haven't gotten with the times, it is that they haven't gotten the message at all.

That rant aside, there are really two ways to deal with this:
1. The court of public opinion - go to the news with it. or
2. The court - a decent law student could probably handle the case

JRutledge Fri Nov 21, 2014 02:31pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoomerSooner (Post 944348)
Why do we, myself included, still make this statement??? I was reading it and clicked to me that the type of thinking that we're discussing was just as wrong in 1914 as it is in 2014. It was accepted much more widely then, but so was slavery in 1814. That didn't make slavery right then either. The problem isn't that people haven't gotten with the times, it is that they haven't gotten the message at all.

That rant aside, there are really two ways to deal with this:
1. The court of public opinion - go to the news with it. or
2. The court - a decent law student could probably handle the case

People still today (women included) believe that women have a place and that is not something you have to go back to the 1800s to find. Heck there are people that feel that women's main job is to be a mom and when you expect more from them, there is a social problem with suggesting they get a job and work like anyone else. So why would we think there is not a disconnect with how and who works games when both genders are treated so differently by those that participate in one or the other.

And unless we know the correspondence of what is requested by people that are independent contractors, we really need to take a step back. I do not see anyone suing college conferences that clearly have not hired any women on the Men's side and hire men all the time Women's college basketball. Even then I believe a lawsuit would be hard if there was a court case in either situation and I doubt there is much of a paper trail to prove that women are not hired systematically. Part of what we do is tribal and people tend to make a business decision as to where they spend their time away from home.

Peace

Adam Fri Nov 21, 2014 02:33pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoomerSooner (Post 944348)
That rant aside, there are really two ways to deal with this:
1. The court of public opinion - go to the news with it. or
2. The court - a decent law student could probably handle the case

In the OP, the "request" was made without any way of documenting it. So, in 1, it's going to be the word of one group against the word of another. No one likes the refs, everyone loves teachers.

In 2, there's no way to document anything. If the schools are already negotiating a switch to another association, then there'd be no way to prove "why" they switched.

Chances are, they may switch even if the new association doesn't even discuss it. It would simply be a way to punish the first association. It would be great if the leadership in the new association decided to follow through on our suggestions, however, and ensure the schools had a steady stream of female officials: even if those officials weren't quite ready for varsity schedules.

Raymond Fri Nov 21, 2014 03:25pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 944350)
...

And unless we know the correspondence of what is requested by people that are independent contractors, we really need to take a step back. ....

Based on my experiences and knowledge of the backroom, off-the-record negotiating that goes on around these parts, it wouldn't surprise me at all that the assertion is 100% true. Whether it is provable or actionable, that's an entirely different story.

But I'm the type who would bring this out in an association meeting so the rumor would either have to be verified or discounted.

JRutledge Fri Nov 21, 2014 04:16pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef (Post 944363)
Based on my experiences and knowledge of the backroom, off-the-record negotiating that goes on around these parts, it wouldn't surprise me at all that the assertion is 100% true. Whether it is provable or actionable, that's an entirely different story.

But I'm the type who would bring this out in an association meeting so the rumor would either have to be verified or discounted.

I am sure this is true on some level, but might not have been communicated in the manner it was here. It is like when people here say, "You are a girls official, I will not hire you for boys games." Now that has been said to people in my area multiple times. I am just wondering if there was more to the comment than "We just do not want to see any women officiating our boys games." And the biggest problem, this is a he said, she said situation. Even if you have this as a court issue, you have to prove more than what someone said to another. You have to have some things documented.

Peace

Raymond Fri Nov 21, 2014 04:43pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 944374)
I am sure this is true on some level, but might not have been communicated in the manner it was here. It is like when people here say, "You are a girls official, I will not hire you for boys games." Now that has been said to people in my area multiple times. I am just wondering if there was more to the comment than "We just do not want to see any women officiating our boys games." And the biggest problem, this is a he said, she said situation. Even if you have this as a court issue, you have to prove more than what someone said to another. You have to have some things documented.

Peace

I understand what you are saying, but VHSL sanctioned organizations don't have "girls" or "boys" officials, and the VHSL's leader has made that very clear throughout the years. So any conference who made such a request would have to do so "off the record".

Like I said earlier, if this were my association I would stand up in the middle of a meeting and bring this to full light by asking for an official response concerning the rumors. It is either true or it is false.

DRJ1960 Fri Nov 21, 2014 05:26pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef (Post 944377)
I understand what you are saying, but VHSL sanctioned organizations don't have "girls" or "boys" officials, and the VHSL's leader has made that very clear throughout the years. So any conference who made such a request would have to do so "off the record".

Like I said earlier, if this were my association I would stand up in the middle of a meeting and bring this to full light by asking for an official response concerning the rumors. It is either true or it is false.

There are no rumors... the Commissioner stood up in the meeting and reported the request.... it's in the minutes.

Rich Fri Nov 21, 2014 05:56pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by DRJ1960 (Post 944385)
There are no rumors... the Commissioner stood up in the meeting and reported the request.... it's in the minutes.

So, is your association willing to do the right thing?

JRutledge Fri Nov 21, 2014 07:12pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef (Post 944377)
I understand what you are saying, but VHSL sanctioned organizations don't have "girls" or "boys" officials, and the VHSL's leader has made that very clear throughout the years. So any conference who made such a request would have to do so "off the record".

Like I said earlier, if this were my association I would stand up in the middle of a meeting and bring this to full light by asking for an official response concerning the rumors. It is either true or it is false.

And I understand that. There are many places across the country that are like that where you work both no matter what. But here you will get in a lot of trouble if you do both if you are not capable to understand the differences. It is just one of those differences we see across the country of how games are assigned. This would not be an "association" decision, it would be a conference decision and no one but the assignor and the schools would know what took place. And there is no one bidding for a contract either.

Peace

DRJ1960 Fri Nov 21, 2014 11:15pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rich (Post 944390)
So, is your association willing to do the right thing?

If, by "the right thing", you mean Associational Suicide (which would be the result of disregarding the "request" from the Schools) then I would think not.

Adam Sat Nov 22, 2014 12:17am

Quote:

Originally Posted by DRJ1960 (Post 944402)
If, by "the right thing", you mean Associational Suicide (which would be the result of disregarding the "request" from the Schools) then I would think not.

So you're going to comply? Do you really think this will preserve the relationship with the schools? Do you really think the officials in the association will be ok with this?

BigCat Sat Nov 22, 2014 01:01am

[QUOTE=DRJ1960;944402]If, by "the right thing", you mean Associational Suicide (which would be the result of disregarding the "request" from the Schools) then I would think not.[/QUOTE

Here's my take on "associational suicide".

1. -tell schools women are qualified and we are sending them...no more or no less women than in past years. Seems like the right thing to do. But if you do the schools may change associations.

2. Go along with schools and tell your women officials they're qualified but not going because they are women. See Covington v IAABO. Can be found on net. Covimgton, woman official, claims discrimination for not being assigned mens games. Maybe your women will just walk away and forget it. However, if they don't, your association will be a defendant since you have involvement in assigning.

The commissioner has put you folks in quite a trick bag. I think I'd try door number one if I were you...actually see earlier post on what to do. And do it because It is the right thing to do...

Raymond Sat Nov 22, 2014 01:23am

If they would leave because of that, then they are going to go anyway.

BigCat Sat Nov 22, 2014 01:45am

Quote:

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef (Post 944408)
If they would leave because of that, then they are going to go anyway.

I agree. And if they wanted to they just should have done it without saying this in the minutes of a meeting. Commissioner has put schools in the same trick bag...

Adam Sat Nov 22, 2014 09:22am

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCat (Post 944411)
I agree. And if they wanted to they just should have done it without saying this in the minutes of a meeting. Commissioner has put schools in the same trick bag...

The school didn't say it in the meeting. The schools still maintain plausible deniability. Frankly, if one must do business with people like this to stay in business, it's probably not worth the headache. You can't trust them.

BigCat Sat Nov 22, 2014 10:09am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adam (Post 944416)
The school didn't say it in the meeting. The schools still maintain plausible deniability. Frankly, if one must do business with people like this to stay in business, it's probably not worth the headache. You can't trust them.

I'm assuming the schools voted on and hired the commissioner. When he speaks and when he acts he is them. --Which is why you don't want to hire knuckleheads to represent you. Nothing is ever as clear/cut and dry in these situations.

What I imagine the schools would say is "our commissioner, he's a little round ( as in not sharp). We sent him there to say we needed better officials for our games..don't send us officials who aren't up to job...." Commissioner may say I meant don't send any official including those women because they are not up to job. Not because of being a woman...

May come down to whether the women in the association are competent--and if somebody decides to take it on.

I guess what I would like to think is that if a school or group of schools said "don't send BigCat, because we just don't want cats,"- someone in my association, my association as a group, would stand up for me. try to help me. One for all all for one sort of deal....
I've never been a fan of "every man for himself."

JRutledge Sat Nov 22, 2014 11:12am

That is the problem. These kinds of relationships are the ultimate problem. So glad we do not have them here. But we seem to be the exception.

Peace

Adam Sat Nov 22, 2014 12:29pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCat (Post 944418)
I'm assuming the schools voted on and hired the commissioner.

You may be right. We don't have a commissioner here, but I've worked in an area that did before. The term is going to be defined differently, and the occupant selected differently, around the country.

That said, I think the best response would be to simply write them a letter:

Dear sirs,
We have received your request that we only send male officials to your boys basketball contests. After discussing it with our attorneys, we have come to the conclusion that it is simply not a lawful request so we must respectfully decline your request.

Sincerely,

Raymond Sat Nov 22, 2014 12:31pm

schools hire an association. Associations determine how the commissioner's slot is filled. The Commissioners work for the association and negotiate contracts on behalf of the associations.

BigCat Sat Nov 22, 2014 01:31pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adam (Post 944422)
You may be right. We don't have a commissioner here, but I've worked in an area that did before. The term is going to be defined differently, and the occupant selected differently, around the country.

That said, I think the best response would be to simply write them a letter:

Dear sirs,
We have received your request that we only send male officials to your boys basketball contests. After discussing it with our attorneys, we have come to the conclusion that it is simply not a lawful request so we must respectfully decline your request.

Sincerely,

Not bad letter Adam...
I think it would be best for the association to talk to lawyer before acting. Better to get some guidance now than have to clean up huge mess later. Example: school person who thought it was ok to say "no women" through "back channel." Bad idea...big mess....

BillyMac Sat Nov 22, 2014 01:50pm

Unfairly Limit Officiating Assignments ...
 
I'm having some trouble following the legal aspects of this discussion, but, for what it's worth (maybe nothing, strike that, probably nothing), here's part of our local Code Of Ethics And Conduct For Board Members:

Board members shall not be party to actions designed to unfairly limit or restrain access to officiating, officiating assignments or association membership. This includes selection for positions of leadership based upon economic factors, race, creed, color, age, sex, physical disability, country of national origin.

Here in Connecticut, our local IAABO boards hire commissioners who are responsible for assigning regular season games, and said commissioners are also local board members.

To inject some Devil's' advocate silliness into this thread, we already have one deaf official (who is quite good). What happens when a legally blind person, or a person in a wheelchair, wants to become an official? Are there limits? Can anyone (short of not passing a criminal background check) be denied? What if they can't pass the written rule test, or the floor exam, due to a physical disability? Will the civil liberty lawyers get them out of "non-officiating jail"? I'm a retired middle school teacher, and we had to adjust exams for various physical, and mental, disabilities for many students. Will we have to give our written rules exam in a language other than English, like they do for our State Department of Motor Vehicles drivers license exam? Braille? Another random thought: After perusing the "list", I find it interesting that sexual orientation is not included in our local Code above. Is anything else missing? What if a faith-based school requests that no gay officials be assigned there? Again, these are random thoughts. Curiosity killed the cat, and, maybe, can kill BillyMac.

Man, this is a complicated topic, that can make your head spin, whether you're a conservative, or a progressive.

https://sp.yimg.com/ib/th?id=HN.6080...8&pid=15.1&P=0

BigCat Sat Nov 22, 2014 02:52pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by BillyMac (Post 944425)
I'm having some trouble following the legal aspects of this discussion, but, for what it's worth (maybe nothing, strike that, probably nothing), here's part of our local Code Of Ethics And Conduct For Board Members:

Board members shall not be party to actions designed to unfairly limit or restrain access to officiating, officiating assignments or association membership. This includes selection for positions of leadership based upon economic factors, race, creed, color, age, sex, physical disability, country of national origin.

Here in Connecticut, our local IAABO boards hire commissioners who are responsible for assigning regular season games, and said commissioners are also a local board members.

To inject some Devil's' advocate silliness into this thread, we already have one deaf official (who is quite good). What happens when a legally blind person, or a person in a wheelchair, wants to become an official? Are there limits? Can anyone (short of not passing a criminal background check) be denied? What if they can't pass the written rule test, or the floor exam, due to a physical disability? Will the civil liberty lawyers get them out of "non-officiating jail"? I'm a retired middle school teacher, and we had to adjust exams for various physical, and mental, disabilities for many students. Will we have to give our written rules exam in a language other than English, like they do for our State Department of Motor Vehicles drivers license exam? Braille? Another random thought: After perusing the "list", I find it interesting that sexual orientation is not included in our local Code above. Is anything else missing? What if a faith-based school requests that no gay officials be assigned there? Again, these are random thoughts. Curiosity killed the cat, and, maybe, can kill BillyMac.

Man, this is a complicated topic, that can make your head spin, whether you're a conservative, or a progressive.

https://sp.yimg.com/ib/th?id=HN.6080...8&pid=15.1&P=0

Please don't let curiosity kill the cat. Specifically me...:)It can be extremely complicated. There's a lot to it. But employers can turn people down for a lot of reasons or no reasons at all. Billy your too fat, too slow, you don't know rules.

What raises the red flags are the big ones...race, sex etc. Billy, you are fired because you are African American or because you are a woman. And even if one of those IS really the reason you are being fired, employers will never say it to you or admit it. A person can sue the employer and claim they were fired for race but if employer can point to anything else, you don't know rules, too slow, you name it...they win.

BillyMac Sat Nov 22, 2014 05:47pm

These Facts Are Not In My Profile ...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCat (Post 944426)
Billy your too fat, too slow, you don't know rules.

Have we met? We know each other from where? I've never been to the Land of Lincoln, and yet, you seem to know me quite well.

BigCat Sun Nov 23, 2014 12:49am

Quote:

Originally Posted by BillyMac (Post 944427)
Have we met? We know each other from where? I've never been to the Land of Lincoln, and yet, you seem to know me quite well.

:) You are known all across the land...

Adam Sun Nov 23, 2014 12:51am

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCat (Post 944458)
:) You are known all across the land...

Please don't feed the BillyMac.

BillyMac Sun Nov 23, 2014 11:44am

Be Afraid, Be Very Afraid ...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Adam (Post 944460)
Please don't feed the BillyMac.

Damn right. Otherwise he'll throw poop at you.

just another ref Sun Nov 23, 2014 12:45pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by BillyMac (Post 944480)
Damn right. Otherwise he'll throw poop at you.

too late

Moosie74 Mon Nov 24, 2014 11:18am

If this association doesn't want females officiating boys games, what do they do with females coaching boys teams?

I can think of a few big schools with women who are the head coach of a boys varsity/JV or middle school teams. One school has a woman coaching each of those levels.

One association I work with has 240 +/- officials, 10 are female, 6 only work subvarsity. Odds say you're getting a male, probably 2-3 most nights regardless of the gender of the participants.

Raymond Mon Nov 24, 2014 11:44am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Moosie74 (Post 944564)
If this association doesn't want females officiating boys games, what do they do with females coaching boys teams?
...

It is not the association that doesn't want females working BV, it's the conference of teams.

The association has a commissioner who handles all contract negotiations with schools and conferences.

AremRed Mon Nov 24, 2014 12:22pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Moosie74 (Post 944564)
If this association doesn't want females officiating boys games, what do they do with females coaching boys teams?

I can think of a few big schools with women who are the head coach of a boys varsity/JV or middle school teams. One school has a woman coaching each of those levels.

One association I work with has 240 +/- officials, 10 are female, 6 only work subvarsity. Odds say you're getting a male, probably 2-3 most nights regardless of the gender of the participants.

Guess your area is more progressive than mine, I've never seen a woman coaching a Freshman/JV boys team, much less the Varsity.

Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. Mon Nov 24, 2014 01:21pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by AremRed (Post 944588)
Guess your area is more progressive than mine, I've never seen a woman coaching a Freshman/JV boys team, much less the Varsity.


AremRed:

WOW! Padgett and I are ancient but even I have officiated boys' games with female coaches.

MTD, Sr.

AremRed Mon Nov 24, 2014 01:28pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. (Post 944595)
AremRed:

WOW! Padgett and I are ancient but even I have officiated boys' games with female coaches.

MTD, Sr.

Well I don't get out as much as you and Padgett ;)

JRutledge Mon Nov 24, 2014 01:42pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. (Post 944595)
AremRed:

WOW! Padgett and I are ancient but even I have officiated boys' games with female coaches.

MTD, Sr.

I have never seen it as well, other than an assistant coach who is the wife of the head coach. She keeps him inline. Otherwise I never see female coaches on the boys side. And I am talking HS and not youth or travel ball. Sometimes you see things differently in those cases.

Peace

Adam Mon Nov 24, 2014 01:48pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 944598)
I have never seen it as well, other than an assistant coach who is the wife of the head coach. She keeps him inline. Otherwise I never see female coaches on the boys side. And I am talking HS and not youth or travel ball. Sometimes you see things differently in those cases.

Peace

I think I've seen one or two.

johnny d Mon Nov 24, 2014 03:15pm

I have never come across a female coach in boy's HS basketball.

BillyMac Mon Nov 24, 2014 05:04pm

Female Coaches ...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by johnny d (Post 944611)
I have never come across a female coach in boy's HS basketball.

I know of one female that used to coach a boys high school varsity team here in the Constitution State. I'm not aware of any others.

BktBallRef Mon Nov 24, 2014 05:11pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef (Post 944185)
One thing: In Virginia if these are private schools, there is nothing the state body (VHSL) can do.

The NCHSAA would not have any jurisdiction either.

However, there is no requirement that an NCHSAA regional supervisor (assignor) has to assign private schools while those same private schools are instructed that they have to use NCHSAA officials.

Advantage: Officials and supervisor

BktBallRef Mon Nov 24, 2014 05:18pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by DRJ1960 (Post 944402)
If, by "the right thing", you mean Associational Suicide (which would be the result of disregarding the "request" from the Schools) then I would think not.

How many schools are we talking about?

Are they private schools? Perhaps that's been answered and I missed it.

Where are they going if they leave your association?

Raymond Mon Nov 24, 2014 08:37pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by BktBallRef (Post 944639)
How many schools are we talking about?

Are they private schools? Perhaps that's been answered and I missed it.

Where are they going if they leave your association?

They would go to my HS association which has about 75% of the work in that area currently.

If you read through the thread just for his and my responses you'll see pertinent info.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:44pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1