![]() |
Designated Spot (Video)
Designated spot violation or not?
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/SRGaZYvFWxQ" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> Peace |
I would say yes
|
Uh, yeah.
|
Fairly easy call; is there a debate going on about this one?
|
Quote:
What is more of a debate is how did the 3 officials on that game? jk. :) Peace |
whenever I'm the throw in designated spot ref, I'll tell the player "you can take one big step to the side or backwards, but not run endline". Ostensibly, the query player thought that endline running was allowed? Looked like he took several steps which was too much.
I like the mechanice the ref displayed. |
Quote:
I've met their supervisor a couple of times, he seems like a good dude. |
Quote:
Also, way too many words. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Does the term 'infinite depth' in relation to spot throw-ins strike a familiar note? The corollary is ****ALWAYS listen to Bob****!!!! |
Quote:
Peace |
Quote:
Peace |
Quote:
|
Quote:
or "You can run." |
Quote:
Peace |
"You can run" or "Spot"
|
Quote:
|
Designated Spot ...
I might have let the inbounder get to the end of the "C" on the floor. Once he got past the "C", then violation was easy to call.
Nice video JRutledge. Thanks for sharing. |
Two Options ...
Quote:
How about NFHS mechanics? |
Quote:
Peace |
IAABO, One Rule, One Interpretation, One Mechanic ...
Quote:
2) Many of us do follow national, written, guidelines. I followed NFHS mechanics for the first half of my career, and now I follow IAABO mechanics. I care because 20% of my peer rating is based on following our written IAABO mechanics. I follow them because my peer rating directly effects my board ranking, and I like to get assigned lots of high level, varsity, games. So. Who cares? I care. And all 325 of my local colleagues care. And my assignment commissioner cares. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
JMF, the call was easy w/o tick marks.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:05am. |