The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   Throw In Violation and AP (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/98510-throw-violation-ap.html)

The_Rookie Mon Oct 13, 2014 05:49pm

Throw In Violation and AP
 
Team A has the alternating-possession arrow to start the second half. Thrower A1 steps over the boundary line and onto inbound territory prior to releasing the ball on a throw-in.

6-4-5-a States B gets the throw in and also AP for B as well.

What is the logic here on the arrow being switched to Team B? Why would it not remain with A since Team B gets the throw in.

Adam Mon Oct 13, 2014 06:46pm

A had their chance for the throw in, since it was lost due to their own mistake, they have used the arrow.

AremRed Mon Oct 13, 2014 07:03pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by The_Rookie (Post 941585)
Team A has the alternating-possession arrow to start the second half. Thrower A1 steps over the boundary line and onto inbound territory prior to releasing the ball on a throw-in.

6-4-5-a States B gets the throw in and also AP for B as well.

What is the logic here on the arrow being switched to Team B? Why would it not remain with A since Team B gets the throw in.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adam (Post 941588)
A had their chance for the throw in, since it was lost due to their own mistake, they have used the arrow.

Adam's got it. I screwed this up this summer and informed the coaches that A would keep their arrow despite A1's throw-in violation.

billyu2 Mon Oct 13, 2014 07:17pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by The_Rookie (Post 941585)
Team A has the alternating-possession arrow to start the second half. Thrower A1 steps over the boundary line and onto inbound territory prior to releasing the ball on a throw-in.

6-4-5-a States B gets the throw in and also AP for B as well.

What is the logic here on the arrow being switched to Team B? Why would it not remain with A since Team B gets the throw in.

4-42-5c. The throw -in ends... When the throw-in team commits a throw-in violation.

Freddy Mon Oct 13, 2014 07:45pm

Agree.
 
Of my "Ten Rulings I Don't Think are Fair", this is one. Seems the harsher penalty on an AP throw-in should be for fouling rather than merely committing a violation. Then again, because it's the opposite of what I'd think would be "fair", it's easy for me to remember.

bob jenkins Mon Oct 13, 2014 07:49pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by The_Rookie (Post 941585)
Team A has the alternating-possession arrow to start the second half. Thrower A1 steps over the boundary line and onto inbound territory prior to releasing the ball on a throw-in.

6-4-5-a States B gets the throw in and also AP for B as well.

What is the logic here on the arrow being switched to Team B? Why would it not remain with A since Team B gets the throw in.

The arrow switches when the throw-in ends.

When does the throw-in end? (Hint: Rule 4 is your friend)

edit: Never mind -- Billyu2 already answered it for you.

Camron Rust Mon Oct 13, 2014 08:31pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Freddy (Post 941593)
Of my "Ten Rulings I Don't Think are Fair", this is one. Seems the harsher penalty on an AP throw-in should be for fouling rather than merely committing a violation. Then again, because it's the opposite of what I'd think would be "fair", it's easy for me to remember.

The foul has its own penalty components which might be considered to be more significant than keeping the arrow.

The_Rookie Mon Oct 13, 2014 09:13pm

What Else on the List?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Freddy (Post 941593)
Of my "Ten Rulings I Don't Think are Fair", this is one. Seems the harsher penalty on an AP throw-in should be for fouling rather than merely committing a violation. Then again, because it's the opposite of what I'd think would be "fair", it's easy for me to remember.

What Else on the list of rulings unfair?

Adam Mon Oct 13, 2014 10:31pm

At the risk of tilting at windmills, I don't think this is unfair at all. A had the chance to have their throw in, their throw in resulted in violation.

In my estimation, the rule should be changed so the arrow changes as soon as the throw-in begins.

Freddy Tue Oct 14, 2014 03:55am

Quote:

Originally Posted by The_Rookie (Post 941600)
What Else on the list of rulings unfair?

Not wanting to hijack thread.
Check PM.

ballgame99 Tue Oct 14, 2014 08:55am

Dang, I messed this up last week too. For a refresher, if A is in the process of making an AP throw in, the only thing that will keep the arrow from switching is if B commits a foul? What if A commits a foul? Sorry, don't have my rulebook available.

bob jenkins Tue Oct 14, 2014 09:01am

Quote:

Originally Posted by ballgame99 (Post 941632)
Dang, I messed this up last week too. For a refresher, if A is in the process of making an AP throw in, the only thing that will keep the arrow from switching is if B commits a foul? What if A commits a foul? Sorry, don't have my rulebook available.

The arrow switches when the throw-in ends. The throw-in ends when the ball is legally touched, touched OOB (except the "plane" issue) or the throw-in team violates. A foul does NOT end the throw-in, so the arrow does not switch.

jeschmit Tue Oct 14, 2014 12:31pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by bob jenkins (Post 941634)
The arrow switches when the throw-in ends. The throw-in ends when the ball is legally touched, touched OOB (except the "plane" issue) or the throw-in team violates. A foul does NOT end the throw-in, so the arrow does not switch.

To add to this, if the defense violates before the ball is legally touched (kicked or batted ball for example), the ensuing throw in would be for the defensive violation and not for the AP throw in. Therefore the arrow would stay with A.

RefCT Tue Oct 14, 2014 12:42pm

Thanks Bbb
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bob jenkins (Post 941634)
The arrow switches when the throw-in ends. The throw-in ends when the ball is legally touched, touched OOB (except the "plane" issue) or the throw-in team violates. A foul does NOT end the throw-in, so the arrow does not switch.

Thanks for this Bob. This was the light-bulb moment for me with the rule (i.e. explained/read multiple times before and never truly got/remembered/understood it. This wording did it).


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:05pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1