Quote:
|
Quote:
*We are not sure what you mean by saying "any type of jab is foul, but just a light finger tip, then nothing"--appears glaringly contradictory. |
Quote:
Sometime between my post-breakfast nap and my pre-lunch nap. Being a retired structural engineer is a demanding job. :p MTD, Sr. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Contact on a shooter may be incidental, or it may be a foul. And yes, there are plenty of cases where you'll have incidental contact on a jump shooter: even if a jab to the stomach isn't one of those cases. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
+1 |
Quote:
|
If you never played high level playground basketball this is done REGULARLY there... that's where it comes from.
Now being a very good jump shooter it does affect a jump shot just by a matter of inches.... believe me You have to call this at the high school level..... On the concrete....you play through it |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'll agree that the threshold for advantage moves a little on a jump shooter from a greater distance, but contact on someone who is shooting is still subject to the incidental contact rule. |
Quote:
But marginal contact doesn't have anything to do with this particular situation. They get one "I see what your trying to do", and then anything subsequent gets a whistle. I am not going with an IF though, no more than I would if they were jabbing at the shooter's elbow, arm, or wrist. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:09pm. |