No Call then Travel (video)
 

Thoughts on this sequence at the end of a game in the Badger State (that would be Wisconsin).


<iframe width="853" height="480" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/JgtYQLDwI9s?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

I am wondering if this was passed on because the dribbler pushed off a little and the defender did not appear to be in a legal position?

Definitely a travel.

Peace

I would have been okay with a block on White for the contact on the dribbler, but I can see letting it play out too.

Definitely a travel whether you have him gathering with the left or right foot on the ground....both return to the ground before he releases the shot.

I think I would get the foul in the back court.
I can see a case for passing on it, though.
Travel is a travel.

Although I could see a foul being called, I wouldn't make a big deal about passing on the call since no advantage was gained.

My main thing here was the contact. I'm not questioning the travel call at all. It's one of those where you start thinking, "If the bump was called, the dribbler gets shots and the kid never gets a chance to travel, etc."

I can see letting the foul go, and I can see calling it. The main thing is to be consistent with what has been called throughout this particular game, and/or what has been said regarding season POEs.

Correct call on the travel.

I'm probably passing on that contact, too. The affect on the dribbler seems minimal, at most, as he gets where he wants to go.