The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   Belmont vs Clemson Video requests v2 (Video) (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/97614-belmont-vs-clemson-video-requests-v2-video.html)

yooperbballref Tue Mar 25, 2014 07:45pm
Belmont vs Clemson Video requests v2 (Video)
 
Two plays stuck out to me in the few minutes of the game that I watched.

At 13:10 there was a flagrant foul that I could see and argument being made going either way, and at the 10:20 mark an over and back call no call that I can't see how was missed.

APG Wed Mar 26, 2014 01:58pm
No verbiage discussion here

Flagrant 1:

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="//www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/B01SUwKitXg" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Backcourt Play:

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="//www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/MU7n2HIZkac" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

AremRed Wed Mar 26, 2014 02:10pm
Play 1: Nothing.

Play 2: Back court violation.

JRutledge Wed Mar 26, 2014 02:14pm
Play #1: Nothing at all.

Play #2: Clearly a BC violation unless I am missing the ball touching by the defender. Not a great angle or close up to help out.

Peace

Rich Wed Mar 26, 2014 02:31pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 929070)
Play #1: Nothing at all.

Play #2: Clearly a BC violation unless I am missing the ball touching by the defender. Not a great angle or close up to help out.

Peace
I think even if it *was* touched by the defender, it still had frontcourt status when the second A player touched the ball.

ballgame99 Wed Mar 26, 2014 02:38pm
1: that's a rough call. I got nothing
2: with that official standing right there I'm going to assume he saw, or thought he saw, the defense deflect it. It did look like the angle of the pass changed a bit. That big orange paw doesn't help matters like this.

JRutledge Wed Mar 26, 2014 03:03pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich (Post 929075)
I think even if it *was* touched by the defender, it still had frontcourt status when the second A player touched the ball.
True. I was just hoping that maybe a touch distracted the official.

Peace

HokiePaul Wed Mar 26, 2014 03:06pm
Play #1: looked like the correct call at full speed. With multiple angles on replay, not so much

Play #2: Not sure if the official saw a defender touch it, but from what I can tell in the video, it looks like a missed back court violation.

Raymond Wed Mar 26, 2014 03:24pm
#1) I have a B22 tripping W32 for a common foul

#2) He missed a violation. Either a kicked ball (and he points at B22's foot) or a BC violation.

rockyroad Wed Mar 26, 2014 03:36pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadNewsRef (Post 929096)
#1) I have a B22 tripping W32 for a common foul

#2) He missed a violation. Either a kicked ball (and he points at B22's foot) or a BC violation.
That's what got me on play 2...he points at the defender to say the defender touched he ball. If he did touch it, it had to be a kick ball violation. Weird.

On first play, I see why he called what he called. When he watches the replays, that official might want that FF1 back.

Camron Rust Wed Mar 26, 2014 03:44pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by rockyroad (Post 929101)
That's what got me on play 2...he points at the defender to say the defender punched he ball. If he did touch it, it had to be a kick ball violation. Weird.

On first play, I see why he called what he called. When he watches the replays, that official might want that FF1 back.
Agree on both. The first should be one violation or another (kick or BC). Can't be nothing.

As for the foul, I could go either way. I'd probably have common but I couldn't disagree with FF1.

Toren Wed Mar 26, 2014 11:50pm
Play 1: Offensive foul


Play 2: back court violation


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:16pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1