|
|
|
Thu Mar 13, 2014, 10:03am
|
|||
|
|||
|
Simultaneous violation? (Video)
Is this a simultaneous violation or do you feel one of them violated first?
) 
|
|
Thu Mar 13, 2014, 10:18am
|
|||
|
|||
|
You cannot have simultaneous violations on the lane line. The first one is considered to cause the second one. If a player came from behind the circle or 3 point line or the shooter missed the rim, then you could have a simultaneous violation. But not in this case.
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
|
|
Thu Mar 13, 2014, 04:37pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
Splitting Hairs ...
Quote:
__________________
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (John 3:16) “I was in prison and you came to visit me.” (Matthew 25:36)
|
|
Thu Mar 13, 2014, 04:59pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
If I had to call one as opposed to the other I would've called it on the defense, though I could live with a simultaneous (which is possible). It appears the crew called it on the offense.
__________________
"Everyone has a purpose in life, even if it's only to serve as a bad example." "If Opportunity knocks and he's not home, Opportunity waits..." "Don't you have to be stupid somewhere else?" "Not until 4." "The NCAA created this mess, so let them live with it." (JRutledge)
|
|
Sat Mar 15, 2014, 03:17am
|
|||
|
|||
|
def was in first
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association
|
|
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 09:23am
|
|||
|
|||
|
Looks like th T had a violation on defense (sideways fist), but that's not even his call is it? He should be looking across should he not?
|
|
Thu Mar 13, 2014, 10:21am
|
|||
|
|||
|
Simultaneous
|
|
Thu Mar 13, 2014, 10:21am
|
||||
|
||||
|
Defense violates first, IMO, by a split second. Either way, I'm not sure they administered it correctly. If it was the defense, there should be another shot. If it was ruled simultaneous, they should have informed the table they would be using the arrow.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
|
|
Thu Mar 13, 2014, 10:37am
|
|||
|
|||
|
Looks very close to being simultaneous. Go to arrow.
|
|
Thu Mar 13, 2014, 03:04pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
From the video angle the black jersey team violated first. Should be another shot for white--unless of course he made the ft. I suppose it's possible but it would be tough to have a simultaneous lane violation.
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FT Simultaneous Violation | onetime1 | Basketball | 27 | Mon Dec 09, 2013 09:04am |
| Simultaneous Free Throw Violation | jayhop | Basketball | 15 | Fri Dec 07, 2012 09:10am |
| Simultaneous Violation | gracealone919 | Basketball | 2 | Mon Oct 05, 2009 12:36am |
| Simultaneous Violation and Foul | grunewar | Basketball | 6 | Fri Mar 06, 2009 10:54pm |
| Simultaneous Lane Violation? | mplagrow | Basketball | 3 | Mon Feb 03, 2003 10:01pm |
Hybrid Mode
