![]() |
I don't offer advice to players or tell them to watch it or be careful why? It's not my job I am there to call the game not be there coach. I think you are setting yourself up when you do that. If I tell gold to get out of the lane and the other ref pops black for 3 seconds now the game is not being called fair. If they ask I will answer but never offer.
|
I guess I'm getting fired because I'll tell a kid 'hey watch your screen, they are getting close to a illegal; or hey watch it with the elbows after a a whistle.'
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Here - the HS coaches go to a pre-season meeting, with the assumption the info is trickled down. I don't know if it happens at all NCAA schools, but at UMD, officials came to the gym, went through demonstrations, situations, and interpretations, and the players and coaches got to ask questions. It was excellent.
|
There is a major change going on with how basketball games are called. We have seen it with the NCAA enforcement of handchecking, two-hands on a ball handler, armbars, etc. The instruction that has been coming out in the past couple of years is to blow the whistle and let the players and coaches adjust. This is replacing the previous method of talking to players early in the game about their hands or other transgressions. The philosophy that is coming down the pipeline now is to call the offense the first time that it happens without any warning.
People who have been officiating for 15-20 years will have to decide whether to get on board with this or continue to work as they always have. What those in charge in their areas desire will determine the impact of this choice. I know that things are not as organized and there is far less oversight at the HS level than for NCAA. So some HS areas will likely continue as they always have, while others will proceed in a manner more closely resembling the current NCAA instruction. What one has to do depends upon one's local area. |
I talk to players before they even do stuff. Even in many cases I say things so they can hear me. And when I do call a foul they are aware I was watching them. My talking is never a substitute for calling a foul. I do not think the two things are mutually exclusive. You talk to players when you have the opportunity to talk to them. You call the foul when something obvious takes place. And many times talking to players is after a foul or violation is called. I do not know how many times I have called a travel on a kid and had them ask, "What did I do?" Or when you call a foul the player says, "Well he pushed me first." Then my answer is often clarifying what I saw or letting them know "I saw exactly what you did......" and they react accordingly as if they know I saw what they did. And they are going to continue to talk to us when they see their pro counterparts do the same at that level when they watch TV. You can name any NBA player and when they disagree they are talking to an official. You have to learn how to navigate those interactions whether it is with a T or talking them out of other bad behavior. I do not think you have to be a robot and only call things when players and teams play differently and approach us differently.
Peace |
Quote:
And if you watched the A10 final Sunday, there was one official who visibly talked to the players the entire game, even during live action. |
Quote:
I'm curious, what did John Adams suggest to say to players to prevent free throw violations? |
Quote:
Peace |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:10pm. |