The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   Playoff brawl (Video) (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/97439-playoff-brawl-video.html)

just another ref Wed Mar 05, 2014 04:03am

Playoff brawl (Video)
 
Had a pretty serious incident involving one of the local teams here.

Epps High School Player gets Assaulted by Plainview Fans during Playoff Game 02/27/2014 - YouTube

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="//www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/5TNMni0XnhA" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

The serious part is at the end of the video, after the 3:00 mark.

just another ref Wed Mar 05, 2014 04:07am

Couple of newspaper accounts:

http://www.thetowntalk.com/article/2...tory-over-Epps

http://www.thetowntalk.com/article/2...l-playoff-game

Camron Rust Wed Mar 05, 2014 04:45am

Unfortunate that the fan (woman in white/green) had to get up and start causing trouble with the visiting team's player.

Seemed like the game was going just fine until that (or at least it seemed so from the video). The girl that stepped out of bounds may have caught a hand across the face just after she stepped out but it was not intentional...and wasn't a foul since the ball has just become dead due to the OOB call. That stuff is going to happen. It is part of the game.

Can't seem much else after that since people are in the way and the video ends.

Shame on that woman for causing this mess.

just another ref Wed Mar 05, 2014 05:20am

While the fan is clearly the main culprit from what I see the player is not squeaky clean either. She accelerates the situation by sticking her hand in the woman's face. The hand get's slapped away and then it's on. I had two questions. First, as you say, based on the reaction of the player on the last possession, she was struck in the face. Did this occur before or after she stepped out of bounds? Second, do we penalize a player for becoming involved in an altercation with a fan when the fan is clearly the initial aggressor? The player didn't even have to retreat. If she had just waited a couple of seconds and kept her hands to herself, the official was already stepping in and calling for help, presumably from police or game management.

Naturally, some will blame the officials. One of the articles said something about the fans blaming the officials for "allowing the game to get out of hand."

And a couple of the youtube commenters agreed that the official should not have allowed the fan to approach the player.

wow

JetMetFan Wed Mar 05, 2014 06:58am

The only thing - by rule - you could consider getting the player for is 10-3-6b (Using profane or inappropriate language or obscene gestures) but I think that would be a stretch and this comes from someone dealing with a "no tolerance" rule regarding profanity in his public school games. There's nothing in the rule book covering player interactions with fans.

I agree the player could've walked away but the hand came up because the "fan" tried to get in her face or might even have said something. If I'm assessing blame I'm going 95/5 in favor of the fan.

To echo Camron, the game didn't look out of hand from what we can see. The team that was more aggressive - and trailing - picked up lots of fouls. Not unusual. Everything goes into the toilet when the knucklehead gets up and confronts a player. I'd like to see the entire game to find out whether the "fan" had been a problem child earlier on. Regardless, I'm not getting involved with a fan if I can help it. That's game management's headache.

eyezen Wed Mar 05, 2014 08:59am

If you really want to start throwing people under the bus, how about those who scheduled a state 1/4 in that gym and on top of it allowed people to sit in the front row knowing the tight confines.

JugglingReferee Wed Mar 05, 2014 09:03am

From what I can see in the video, I'm tossing the fan and nothing to the player.

I'm not faulting the player for defending herself.

deecee Wed Mar 05, 2014 09:10am

Quote:

Originally Posted by eyezen (Post 925755)
If you really want to start throwing people under the bus, how about those who scheduled a state 1/4 in that gym and on top of it allowed people to sit in the front row knowing the tight confines.

Really? What do you propose. A game in a stadium with barbed wire around the court :rolleyes:

Raymond Wed Mar 05, 2014 09:19am

Quote:

Originally Posted by deecee (Post 925760)
Really? What do you propose. A game in a stadium with barbed wire around the court :rolleyes:

A bigger gym?

But that appears to be the higher seed's homecourt.

Dexter555 Wed Mar 05, 2014 09:23am

From the news article: "All of the fans were forced to leave by local authorities, but the game’s officials did not assess any technical fouls or eject any players, despite the fact that punches were thrown and several Epps players left the bench to participate in the brawl."

So many questions pop into my head if I think about what I would have done:
- I want to say I'd have been noting jersey numbers for all players fighting and leaving bench. Given that it was instigated by the crowd, I think in conferencing I'd be open to not issuing Ts or ejections, but would be hard to convince me.
- After the gym is cleared, what is the discussion like on whether or not to continue the game/T's/ejections?
- It took 10 minutes to get it under control. Wearing stripes makes you a target from some knucklehead. Do you stay in the gym when the stands are emptying for a brawl?

Given the accounts, it seems this crew did about as well as they could. I commend them.

I pray none of us ever has to deal with this in any of our games!

bob jenkins Wed Mar 05, 2014 09:42am

Quote:

Originally Posted by deecee (Post 925760)
Really? What do you propose. A game in a stadium with barbed wire around the court :rolleyes:

The players could be called "cagers". Oh, wait.

eyezen Wed Mar 05, 2014 10:03am

Quote:

Originally Posted by deecee (Post 925760)
Really? What do you propose. A game in a stadium with barbed wire around the court :rolleyes:

Why not?

I mean if we're going to start blaming people other than parties involved like the officials. I was being halfway facetious in my OP, but then again I've seen a lot worse arguments for a lawsuit than this.

I don't know how Louisiana does things but in Missouri and I' sure most states the venues go to progressively larger neutral sites as their state tourney goes deeper. This wasn't some district/regional play-in game. This was a state 1/4 final, winner goes to state final four. In MO even in lowly district play, if a host schools rotation comes up and doesn't have enough accommodations, they could be force to go to a different site. The state hosts games at big high schools and small colleges for state tourney play beyond districts and before the final four.

A (weak) argument could be made that the state was negligent in hosting a game in an inadequate venue. A (weak) argument could be made that game management did not do due diligence and did not created a proper buffer zone with the font row.

#olderthanilook Wed Mar 05, 2014 10:14am

Quote:

Originally Posted by eyezen (Post 925776)
Why not?

I mean if we're going to start blaming people other than parties involved like the officials. I was being halfway facetious in my OP, but then again I've seen a lot worse arguments for a lawsuit than this.

I don't know how Louisiana does things but in Missouri and I' sure most states the venues go to progressively larger neutral sites as their state tourney goes deeper. This wasn't some district/regional play-in game. This was a state 1/4 final, winner goes to state final four. In MO even in lowly district play, if a host schools rotation comes up and doesn't have enough accommodations, they could be force to go to a different site. The state hosts games at big high schools and small colleges for state tourney play beyond districts and before the final four.

A (weak) argument could be made that the state was negligent in hosting a game in an inadequate venue. A (weak) argument could be made that game management did not do due diligence and did not created a proper buffer zone with the font row.

At first, I thought this was a college game based on the officials reporting mechanics. But, I'm with you, this venue is a cracker box - a powder keg waiting to blow. There isn't any room for anyone to even breathe in that place.

Conditions were ripe for what happened, imo.

dsqrddgd909 Wed Mar 05, 2014 10:24am

Quote:

Originally Posted by JetMetFan (Post 925753)
The only thing - by rule - you could consider getting the player for is 10-3-6b (Using profane or inappropriate language or obscene gestures) but I think that would be a stretch and this comes from someone dealing with a "no tolerance" rule regarding profanity in his public school games. There's nothing in the rule book covering player interactions with fans.

I agree the player could've walked away but the hand came up because the "fan" tried to get in her face or might even have said something. If I'm assessing blame I'm going 95/5 in favor of the fan.

To echo Camron, the game didn't look out of hand from what we can see. The team that was more aggressive - and trailing - picked up lots of fouls. Not unusual. Everything goes into the toilet when the knucklehead gets up and confronts a player. I'd like to see the entire game to find out whether the "fan" had been a problem child earlier on. Regardless, I'm not getting involved with a fan if I can help it. That's game management's headache.

A hypothetical question: Is there any action by a player directed towards a fan that would warrant a T or ejection? I'm thinking a player spitting on a fan or threatening a fan.

JetMetFan Wed Mar 05, 2014 10:45am

Quote:

Originally Posted by dsqrddgd909 (Post 925778)
A hypothetical question: Is there any action by a player directed towards a fan that would warrant a T or ejection? I'm thinking a player spitting on a fan or threatening a fan.

It's really the same situation as the Marcus Smart scenario. I'm sure 2-3 could be invoked and an official could come up with something but in this case I wouldn't simply because it was the fan who started it. If anything I'd be more likely to ring up the home team for not controlling the crowd.

I called a T on the kid last month in a BV game for responding to the crowd but that's because he dropped an F-bomb, meaning he violated NYC public schools' "no tolerance" rule for profanity (plus he yelled said F-bomb to the opposite side of the gym while he was sitting on the bench...with two minutes left in a tie game). If he didn't swear I would've told his coach to tell him to keep his mouth shut.

Camron Rust Wed Mar 05, 2014 12:05pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by just another ref (Post 925749)
First, as you say, based on the reaction of the player on the last possession, she was struck in the face. Did this occur before or after she stepped out of bounds?

I believe she was out first. While we can't see the line, we can see her step in the direction of the line just before before being hit in the face and not stepping any more that direction before the whistle. I think it is save to assume she was out first, just barely.

Quote:

Originally Posted by just another ref (Post 925749)
Second, do we penalize a player for becoming involved in an altercation with a fan when the fan is clearly the initial aggressor?

Yes. Unsportsmanlike behavior is unsportsmanlike behavior even if it is aimed towards a fan. It doesn't matter who starts it.

johnny d Wed Mar 05, 2014 12:44pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dexter555 (Post 925767)
From the news article: "All of the fans were forced to leave by local authorities, but the game’s officials did not assess any technical fouls or eject any players, despite the fact that punches were thrown and several Epps players left the bench to participate in the brawl."

So many questions pop into my head if I think about what I would have done:
- I want to say I'd have been noting jersey numbers for all players fighting and leaving bench. Given that it was instigated by the crowd, I think in conferencing I'd be open to not issuing Ts or ejections, but would be hard to convince me.
- After the gym is cleared, what is the discussion like on whether or not to continue the game/T's/ejections?
- It took 10 minutes to get it under control. Wearing stripes makes you a target from some knucklehead. Do you stay in the gym when the stands are emptying for a brawl?

Given the accounts, it seems this crew did about as well as they could. I commend them.

I pray none of us ever has to deal with this in any of our games!



As soon as the stands start emptying, I am on my way to the safest spot I can think of. If that means leaving the gym, I am gone. Diffusing/ending this type of brawl is the responsibility of game management, security, and local law enforcement. I will be nowhere near it. This makes your first part about getting numbers irrelevant. I most likely wont be there to get them. Once the gym is cleared, I would have no problem finishing the game.

The first year I officiated, I worked some games for a catholic grade school league. During a sixth grade game, we had a home player commit an intentional foul for excessive contact. We called the intentional foul, and the home coach removed the player and gave them a lecture on how their behavior was inappropriate. This apparently was not satisfactory to some fans from the visiting team who started saying some derogatory stuff about the home teams players and fans. Needless to say, an all out brawl started in the stands and spilled onto the court. My partner and I looked at each other, ran off the court to the cafeteria/concession stand, which was where we kept our stuff and waited for the police to come and take care of the problem. While we were in there, the home school AD came and asked us what we were going to do the breakup the fight in the gym. We both told him absolutely nothing and suggested he call the local police. They came and arrested a number of people, and we finished the game in an empty gym.

Last catholic grade school game I ever officiated.

Sharpshooternes Wed Mar 05, 2014 01:25pm

What was with the awesome switch after the foul call at 2:22 on the game clock?

BillyMac Wed Mar 05, 2014 05:30pm

You Can Look It Up ...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by deecee (Post 925760)
Really? What do you propose. A game in a stadium with barbed wire around the court

Why do you think that basketball players used to called "cagers"?

http://ts2.mm.bing.net/th?id=HN.6079...12517&pid=15.1

Rich Thu Mar 06, 2014 12:20am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sharpshooternes (Post 925818)
What was with the awesome switch after the foul call at 2:22 on the game clock?

In Louisiana, the calling official goes opposite the table. It's in their manual that I was able to find with one Google search. :D

j51969 Thu Mar 06, 2014 10:13am

I am not familiar with either community, but this looks to me like the typical "white vs black community thing". Even if nothing happens on the court there always seems to be some drama that unfolds in the aftermath. You can't fix stupid, but for my money this is the most ridiculous thing in sports youth or otherwise.

Here is a recent incident from my home town in Indiana. These things will just never go away....

IHSAA investigating claims of racism at girls' semi-state game - 13 WTHR Indianapolis

AremRed Thu Mar 06, 2014 11:33am

Quote:

Originally Posted by j51969 (Post 925936)
I am not familiar with either community, but this looks to me like the typical "white vs black community thing". Even if nothing happens on the court there always seems to be some drama that unfolds in the aftermath. You can't fix stupid, but for my money this is the most ridiculous thing in sports youth or otherwise.

Here is a recent incident from my home town in Indiana. These things will just never go away....

IHSAA investigating claims of racism at girls' semi-state game - 13 WTHR Indianapolis

Heh, that's not racism that's clever taunting. The gorilla suit was probably unintentional. Playoff sites are chosen before the season starts.

j51969 Thu Mar 06, 2014 02:14pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by AremRed (Post 925956)
Heh, that's not racism that's clever taunting. The gorilla suit was probably unintentional. Playoff sites are chosen before the season starts.

My thoughts as well.

I'm not an African American, so I won't claim to understand how racism feels. But, it also seems that too often we have a solution in search of a problem. Wasn't there, and don't know the kids or the school. Maybe this was some sort of clever racist rouse. I went to Warren Central on the east side of Indy. Our moniker was a warrior. If students dressed up like actual warriors would they now have to apologize to all Native Americans? My feeling is the majority of these issues surround adults putting in their two cents were it doesn’t belong. Sometimes kids are just that kids. And then there’s this guy……

Racial Sensitivity 101 | Abdul | NUVO News | Indianapolis, IN

Who knows what the answer is. I doubt there is one………….

BillyMac Thu Mar 06, 2014 05:15pm

Maybe ...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by j51969 (Post 925998)
If students dressed up like actual warriors would they now have to apologize to all Native Americans?

Maybe. What do the native Americans in that area think about the school's nickname, logo, mascot, etc. Maybe they think that it celebrates, accurately, the native American heritage in that area, or maybe they think that it's not accurate (not all native Americans look, dress, act, etc., the same), and possibly downright offensive.

http://ts2.mm.bing.net/th?id=HN.6079...37949&pid=15.1

JRutledge Thu Mar 06, 2014 07:20pm

Sure it wasn't racism or had a racial issue. Yep. You guys go with that!!!

Peace

BryanV21 Thu Mar 06, 2014 07:56pm

If a player does something that I deem unsportsmanlike, it gets penalized appropriately. It doesn't matter whether that unsportsmanlike act is directed towards another player, a coach, a fan, media member, etc.

Now, that doesn't mean I would stick around during a brawl to catch a player doing something wrong. Once that brawl starts I'm out of there, and game management can deal with it.

As for this situation specifically, I might be inclined to penalize the player for getting in the fan's face and escalating things. I've seen plenty of taunting from fans towards players, but that doesn't give the player the right to retaliate in any way.

Camron Rust Thu Mar 06, 2014 08:43pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 926056)
Sure it wasn't racism or had a racial issue. Yep. You guys go with that!!!

Peace

Just because it could be doesn't mean it was. Neither you nor I have any idea if it really was or wasn't short of making assumptions not based in fact. If you're comfortable assuming conflicts between individuals of different races is based in racism, I feel very sorry for the life you live. I prefer to assume individuals of all races are innocent, honest, and meaning no ill will unless there is clear proof to the contrary.

JRutledge Thu Mar 06, 2014 09:01pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Camron Rust (Post 926070)
Just because it could be doesn't mean it was. Neither you nor I have any idea if it really was or wasn't short of making assumptions not based in fact. If you're comfortable assuming conflicts between individuals of different races is based in racism, I feel very sorry for the life you live. I prefer to assume individuals of all races are innocent, honest, and meaning no ill will unless there is clear proof to the contrary.

And just because the AD or administrator says it was not the intention, does not mean there was not an intention. And based on other things said, I believe that was the motive.

I am also not assuming things, I know history and actions. Yes all of a sudden a "Safari theme?" OoooooooKaayyyyyyyy!!!!

Racism did not just all of a sudden go away because the President is not white. There are a lot of subtle things being said and done well outside of sports and you are not going to tell me that this was not the background.

I have been in enough situations where little subtle things are said or implied or suggested by the people that if you accuse them of something, they somehow "Well that is not what I meant" BS. And if you noticed it was more than the Gorilla suit, it was other comments stated by the players that were said to them. I do not expect anyone honestly who is not African-American to see the way many do that are African-American. BUt this is old hat for some of us and not a surprise that something like this happen. A lot of code wording used to make a point without thinking you will be found out. They were exposed and it would be better for the administrator to make sure it does not happen instead of making excuses.

Peace

Camron Rust Thu Mar 06, 2014 09:21pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 926075)
And just because the AD or administrator says it was not the intention, does not mean there was not an intention. And based on other things said, I believe that was the motive.

I am also not assuming things, I know history and actions. Yes all of a sudden a "Safari theme?" OoooooooKaayyyyyyyy!!!!

Racism did not just all of a sudden go away because the President is not white. There are a lot of subtle things being said and done well outside of sports and you are not going to tell me that this was not the background.

I have been in enough situations where little subtle things are said or implied or suggested by the people that if you accuse them of something, they somehow "Well that is not what I meant" BS. And if you noticed it was more than the Gorilla suit, it was other comments stated by the players that were said to them. I do not expect anyone honestly who is not African-American to see the way many do that are African-American. BUt this is old hat for some of us and not a surprise that something like this happen. A lot of code wording used to make a point without thinking you will be found out. They were exposed and it would be better for the administrator to make sure it does not happen instead of making excuses.

Peace

You say you're not assuming things then go right on stating what you're assuming. Brilliant.

The most racist thing I've seen related to this incident is the assumption by some that whatever they did must have been racially motivated because they were white and other whites have done racist things in the past.

If the world were to use your standard, every person of any race would be a criminal if some people of that race committed a crime? Are you OK with that? Or isn't that really what you're trying to stop?

Again you must be miserable if you can only imagine that everything that could remotely be racial is racial and that everything that is said that you don't like must have racial overtones.

JRutledge Thu Mar 06, 2014 09:44pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Camron Rust (Post 926078)
You say you're not assuming things then go right on stating what you're assuming. Brilliant.

The most racist thing I've seen related to this incident is the assumption by some that whatever they did must have been racially motivated because they were white and other whites have done racist things in the past.

If the world were to use your standard, every person of any race would be a criminal if some people of that race committed a crime? Are you OK with that?

Again you must be miserable if you can only imagine that everything that could remotely be racial is racial and that everything that is said that you don't like must have racial overtones.

This is not about my standard. I have enough life experiences to know when people did not think fondly of you because of what race you are. I am sure I have been to more situations than many here where they were the "only one of their race" or you are not like the majority of the crowd or people in the building. I said this years ago, most African-Americans could go out of their way and avoid a lot of other African-Americans on a daily basis. It would be almost impossible to go to a place where there were no Caucasians. My point is many times I have been in situations where it is clear my or other's presence stands out, just as an official alone. It is very easy to pick up on when you are not wanted or people stereotype you for all kinds of things. Thinks like assume you know certain people. Thinks like assume you live in certain places. Assume you have all kinds of background experiences. And it is not unusual to have people say things with all those things in mind.

And most of all I am not asking for your approval of my position Camron. I really could give a damn if you see this my way or not. I feel that in this situation where sports and communities are different, that people know damn well what they are trying to say to people from those very different communities. Not saying everyone was involved, but you will not convince me that a few of them knew what they were saying or what message they wanted to get across to this team. Seen it enough and see it all the time where I live. We have a very diverse state and there are a lot of rural communities that do not have a lot of diversity and the minute they come to a place where there are more mixture, it is not uncommon to have problems or see an underlining feeling from certain groups of people (either way). And the 2A State Championship here had a lot of that in the crowd, on the message boards, with people that were at that game or not at that game.

Peace

just another ref Thu Mar 06, 2014 09:49pm

Once upon a time here, didn't the originator of a thread have the option of locking it?

Adam Thu Mar 06, 2014 09:51pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by just another ref (Post 926083)
Once upon a time here, didn't the originator of a thread have the option of locking it?

Delete, yes. Lock, no.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:09pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1