North Carolina vs. Duke

[Raymond]

1) exaggeration by defender, but still a PC

2) that wasn't across the lane. I was right I the middle, inside the RA. Defender did not stay vertical while airborne

3) probably a goaltend, but it took me too many replays to figure it out, so I'm not criticizing the no-call.

[Raymond]

4) Upward motion play, John Adams wants this called a block, as it was.

5) defender did nothing wrong, should have been a no-call

6) defender hits shooters arm, should have been a call

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

2) that wasn't across the lane. I was right I the middle, inside the RA. Defender did not stay vertical while airborne

Pat Driscoll called this on #5, who is across the lane from him. Problem is #5 never touched the shooter. Thus, don't call across the lane. Referee your defender, #1 in this case, who did foul the shooter.

Play 1: No call. Offensive player goes to but not through.

Play 2: Foul on #1, not #5.

Play 3: Goaltending.

Play 4: Block.

Play 5: No call.

Play 6: Foul.

[Camron Rust]

#1. PC called but it was a flop. Should have been a no call.

#2. Correct Call. Defender jumped into the shooter. And that is NOT across the lane. It was well in the lane.
EDIT: It looks like the call may have been against the wrong player, however, but there was a foul.

#3. GT. It was inconclusive from the first angle. It was obvious from the 2nd angle.

#4. Block. Late to the spot....even in NFHS as he was still moving into the shooter all the way to contact.

#5. I definitely don't see a block. But I do see the defender left arm across the front of the shooter as hey's moving to go up. Perhaps a hold or illegal use of hands but I'm not sure it is enough to call.

#6. Shooter came into defender's arms. Defender had LGP and was just raising them above his head which is legal.