The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 11, 2014, 11:19am
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,582
What did they end up ruling?

Clearly a Flagrant 2 on the shot attempt.

I can see why a foul was not called on the rebound before, but a foul would have been very appropriate here.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 11, 2014, 11:24am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 58
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge View Post
What did they end up ruling?

Clearly a Flagrant 2 on the shot attempt.

I can see why a foul was not called on the rebound before, but a foul would have been very appropriate here.

Peace
The ruling was a FF1 for the kick and an FF2 for the hit to the head.
__________________
Brian
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 11, 2014, 11:31am
Archaic Power Monger
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,983
Quote:
Originally Posted by VTOfficial View Post
The ruling was a FF1 for the kick and an FF2 for the hit to the head.
Interesting.

I'm speaking HS here but I'd have a flagrant on both plays. That kick was intentional and completely unnecessary.
__________________
Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there. - Will Rogers
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 11, 2014, 11:40am
TODO: creative title here
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 1,250
On the Kick:
T looks to be straightlined.
C should have had a look at it, but he doesn't have the best angle either.
L could've had a crew-saver if he had called it, but I don't think he was looking in that direction.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 11, 2014, 11:52am
APG APG is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,889
The rebound and kick reminds me of this play:

__________________
Chaos isn't a pit. Chaos is a ladder. Many who try to climb it fail and never get to try again. The fall breaks them. And some, given a chance to climb, they refuse. They cling to the realm, or the gods, or love. Illusions.

Only the ladder is real. The climb is all there is.

Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 11, 2014, 12:05pm
Eschew obfuscation.
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: IL
Posts: 304
I gotta say it... What about the missed travel on R22?



I got FF2 on both of them. Kick was unnecessary and extreme, and the swing was obviously warranting an ejection.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 11, 2014, 12:25pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Missouri
Posts: 671
I don't see any bad intentions in the OP kick. His foot got higher than it should have, his momentum carried him into the defender and made contact and got caught in the jersey and should have been called a foul, but he doesn't seem to really 'kick' the guy and the contact is low. I don't see a FF1 or intentional. The punch on the shooter is an easy FF2. You are winning by 30, why on Earth are you punching a shooter?
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 11, 2014, 12:54pm
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by Welpe View Post
Interesting.

I'm speaking HS here but I'd have a flagrant on both plays. That kick was intentional and completely unnecessary.
Agreed.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 11, 2014, 11:25am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 270
Sorry...but I cannot see how a foul was NOT called on the rebound. It is clear that there was a kick to the abdomen. That is what one camp evaluator I had would call a "Grandma call"...the 95 year old grandma sitting in the top row of the gym knows that is a foul. A player is not entitled to go up vertically then kick his/her legs out horizontally to the floor and contact another player.

Getting the foul on the rebound would have stopped everything else.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
UConn v. West Virginia APG Basketball 5 Sun Mar 11, 2012 08:22am
West Virginia AAA State Championship Game Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. Football 1 Fri Dec 03, 2010 11:47pm
Pittsburgh/West Virginia last night fullor30 Basketball 1 Fri Feb 08, 2008 09:31am
Georgetown vs West Virginia Jerrylh Basketball 13 Wed Jan 30, 2008 07:09am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:41am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1