The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 16, 2014, 10:24am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 201


So, if this is off her forearms before the horn, and goes in the bucket after the horn, it's a good bucket.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 16, 2014, 10:29am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,238
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jesse James View Post


So, if this is off her forearms before the horn, and goes in the bucket after the horn, it's a good bucket.
If you judge it to be a try, then yes.

(No one would really do this, so that's why 4-41-5 says "hands")
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 16, 2014, 10:42am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 201
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins View Post

(No one would really do this, so that's why 4-41-5 says "hands")
While I've never seen it--at that point--if it can count as a hoop, it's a better option than catch-and-shoot.

Last edited by Jesse James; Thu Jan 16, 2014 at 10:47am.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 16, 2014, 12:45pm
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jesse James View Post
While I've never seen it--at that point--if it can count as a hoop, it's a better option than catch-and-shoot.
If she doesn't catch it, it's a tap. The rule simply says it can't be caught, so that's all you need to judge.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 16, 2014, 12:53pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Virginia
Posts: 546
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins View Post
If you judge it to be a try, then yes.

(No one would really do this, so that's why 4-41-5 says "hands")
In all seriousness, would anyone consider this a try?

I mentioned the prohibition against using a fist to punch the ball, and with 4-41-5 refering to "hands", I would have a hard time finding a justification for calling this a try and allowing the ball to remain live after the horn.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 16, 2014, 01:01pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,238
Quote:
Originally Posted by HokiePaul View Post
In all seriousness, would anyone consider this a try?
If the player is "attempting to score" then I'm considering it a try.

As I said before, as a practical matter, it's not going to happen. If there's only .3 left, then the ball will be thrown and contacted up high. If there's more than .3 left, then the player will attempt to catch the ball as opposed to "bumping" the ball.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 17, 2014, 02:09pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Virginia
Posts: 546
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins View Post
If the player is "attempting to score" then I'm considering it a try.

As I said before, as a practical matter, it's not going to happen. If there's only .3 left, then the ball will be thrown and contacted up high. If there's more than .3 left, then the player will attempt to catch the ball as opposed to "bumping" the ball.
May be impractical, (although I've seen discussion of more far-fetched scenarios here), but it could come into play at the end of a game in terms of whether or not the ball is dead on the horn or whether or not the ball remains live during the try for goal.

Do you draw the line anywhere in terms of what body part is used to "attempt to score". If the volleyball forearm bump could be considered an attempt to score, then it seems like you are including "arms" as a body part that could be
considered acceptable for a "tap" in an attempt to score.
What about a soccer style "header" an attempt to score?

I'm inclined to stick with the strict interpretation of the definition of a tap that required "hands". But I was curious what others think.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 17, 2014, 02:35pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by HokiePaul View Post
May be impractical, (although I've seen discussion of more far-fetched scenarios here), but it could come into play at the end of a game in terms of whether or not the ball is dead on the horn or whether or not the ball remains live during the try for goal.

Do you draw the line anywhere in terms of what body part is used to "attempt to score". If the volleyball forearm bump could be considered an attempt to score, then it seems like you are including "arms" as a body part that could be
considered acceptable for a "tap" in an attempt to score.
What about a soccer style "header" an attempt to score?

I'm inclined to stick with the strict interpretation of the definition of a tap that required "hands". But I was curious what others think.
I would include arms. I would include head. If I thought it was an attempt to direct the ball toward the basket, on purpose, it's a try.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 17, 2014, 02:56pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by MD Longhorn View Post
I would include arms. I would include head. If I thought it was an attempt to direct the ball toward the basket, on purpose, it's a try.



The rule defines a tap as contacting the ball with "hand(s)." So if it hits the forarms or head, it is not a tap and the ball is dead on the horn. However, if the player strikes the ball with the HANDS held together in "volleyball bump position" that is a tap, and the goal counts even after the horn.

I've actually wondered before why I've never heard of a team trying a "volleyball shot" when down by 3 with 0.3 or less on the clock. I've especially wondered it at the HS/NCAA women levels where it is likely that there is at least one experienced volleyball player on the squad. Sure its an unlikely shot.... but with a skilled volleyballer I think the odds are better than a lob into the paint-made tap-foul combination.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:45pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1