The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   Video Request: Auburn-Missouri - Last play of the game (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/96991-video-request-auburn-missouri-last-play-game.html)

VTOfficial Sat Jan 11, 2014 04:26pm

Video Request: Auburn-Missouri - Last play of the game
 
If someone could post the video of the last play of the Auburn-Missouri game, it looks like either a travel or OOB call should have been made with a few ticks left on the clock.

ballgame99 Sat Jan 11, 2014 06:14pm

While you are at it get the block/charge at 1:00 of the second half. Thought it was a block.

JetMetFan Sat Jan 11, 2014 11:28pm

video added
 
Here are the plays...

Quote:

Originally Posted by VTOfficial (Post 917772)
If someone could post the video of the last play of the Auburn-Missouri game, it looks like either a travel or OOB call should have been made with a few ticks left on the clock.

<iframe width="853" height="480" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/JoODKjE94M0?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>



Quote:

Originally Posted by ballgame99 (Post 917774)
While you are at it get the block/charge at 1:00 of the second half. Thought it was a block.

<iframe width="853" height="480" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/vIOdZ8goRvA?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

JRutledge Sat Jan 11, 2014 11:41pm

First play is a travel. No question. I think the official was too close trying to get out of the way.

Second play I have no problem with the charge. The NCAA created this mess, so let them live with it. ;)

Peace

Ref16 Sat Jan 11, 2014 11:48pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 917793)
First play is a travel. No question. I think the official was too close trying to get out of the way.

Second play I have no problem with the charge. The NCAA created this mess, so let them live with it. ;)

Peace

100% agree

BryanV21 Sat Jan 11, 2014 11:54pm

Coaches tell their players to play until you hear a whistle or horn. Officials have to officiate the same way. This guy clearly thought "game over" and stopped officiating.

As for the block/charge call, I have a hard time judging an official for their call. It looks to me like a block, as the defender got into position late, but being on the floor only a few feet from the play is much different than watching it on TV.

zm1283 Sun Jan 12, 2014 02:50am

The second play is a block and it's not really that close considering other plays that have been called blocks this year.

Have I mentioned the new rule is awful?

Camron Rust Sun Jan 12, 2014 03:05am

Under the new NCAA block/charge parameters, that was a block.

Under HS rules, that was a charge.

Nevadaref Sun Jan 12, 2014 03:46am

Suspension coming
 
Sad to see the official give up on the play like that.
When the right foot touches the floor it is simultaneously both traveling and an OOB violation. There is 0.7 on the clock at this point.

I have a charge on the 2nd play. If that's going to be a blocking foul by rule, then defenders have no reasonable amount of protection anymore and coaches will be teaching their players to run everyone over.

twocentsworth Sun Jan 12, 2014 10:07am

The official was too close to the sideline play to see the travel and the out-of-bounds violation.

As for the block/charge play, that's an easy block under the revised NCAA-M rules this year. The official HAS to get this correct (especially w/1:05 left on the clock).

bob jenkins Sun Jan 12, 2014 10:10am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nevadaref (Post 917812)
Sad to see the official give up on the play like that.
When the right foot touches the floor it is simultaneously both traveling and an OOB violation. There is 0.7 on the clock at this point.

I have a charge on the 2nd play. If that's going to be a blocking foul by rule, then defenders have no reasonable amount of protection anymore and coaches will be teaching their players to run everyone over.

They already are, and on the other side, you see many players just getting out of the way and giving the easy lay-up. I think that's part of what the NCAA wants.

jeschmit Sun Jan 12, 2014 05:51pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Camron Rust (Post 917809)
Under the new NCAA block/charge parameters, that was a block.

Under HS rules, that was a charge.

Under NCAAW rules this is a charge as well...

AremRed Sun Jan 12, 2014 05:58pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Camron Rust (Post 917809)
Under the new NCAA block/charge parameters, that was a block.

Under HS rules, that was a charge.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nevadaref (Post 917812)
When the right foot touches the floor it is simultaneously both traveling and an OOB violation. There is 0.7 on the clock at this point.

I agree.

#olderthanilook Mon Jan 13, 2014 11:34am

I was watching the game, and as it ended was asking myself why the other two officials didn't come together to talk about the play to make sure they got it right. Instead, they all just ran off the court.

Not sure if there is any NCAA protocol for a situation like that. Apparently, there isn't.

Any of you NCAA guys have further input?

bob jenkins Mon Jan 13, 2014 11:53am

Quote:

Originally Posted by #olderthanilook (Post 918033)
I was watching the game, and as it ended was asking myself why the other two officials didn't come together to talk about the play to make sure they got it right. Instead, they all just ran off the court.

Not sure if there is any NCAA protocol for a situation like that. Apparently, there isn't.

Any of you NCAA guys have further input?

It's not a monitor review item (I don't think), and neither of the other officials would have a look at the line.

On the travel, you (as one of the other officials) need to decide if you had a good enough look at it and if it was a "crew saving" call. If so, then make it. don't get together after the fact to try to correct it.

#olderthanilook Mon Jan 13, 2014 12:38pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by bob jenkins (Post 918035)
It's not a monitor review item (I don't think), and neither of the other officials would have a look at the line.

On the travel, you (as one of the other officials) need to decide if you had a good enough look at it and if it was a "crew saving" call. If so, then make it. don't get together after the fact to try to correct it.

Is this a situation that the SEC assignor will review with the official(s)? I hate seeing any official make mistakes that could result in harsh reprimand and/or consequences. But, that mismanagement of the game was a pretty big deal. I'm somewhat surprised the Auburn coach hasn't made a big deal about not getting an opportunity for another inbound play that would give his team another chance to tie or win the game.

ballgame99 Mon Jan 13, 2014 01:38pm

I just remembered another play in this game I needed some help on. In the second half a Mizzou player is fouled on the shot, it is the defender's 5th. The defender apparently said something to, or bumped into an official (never showed any replay or got clarification) and got a T. Missouri shoots two shots, then shoots two technicals, then Auburn inbounds. I was very confused. What circumstances would result in Auburn getting the ball back after a T has been called?

Rich Mon Jan 13, 2014 01:44pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by ballgame99 (Post 918054)
I just remembered another play in this game I needed some help on. In the second half a Mizzou player is fouled on the shot, it is the defender's 5th. The defender apparently said something to, or bumped into an official (never showed any replay or got clarification) and got a T. Missouri shoots two shots, then shoots two technicals, then Auburn inbounds. I was very confused. What circumstances would result in Auburn getting the ball back after a T has been called?

NCAA rules are different than NFHS rules for a subset of technical fouls.

MD Longhorn Mon Jan 13, 2014 01:46pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by ballgame99 (Post 918054)
I just remembered another play in this game I needed some help on. In the second half a Mizzou player is fouled on the shot, it is the defender's 5th. The defender apparently said something to, or bumped into an official (never showed any replay or got clarification) and got a T. Missouri shoots two shots, then shoots two technicals, then Auburn inbounds. I was very confused. What circumstances would result in Auburn getting the ball back after a T has been called?

The circumstance you describe would.

NCAA has you shoot the tech first.

johnny d Mon Jan 13, 2014 02:02pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by ballgame99 (Post 918054)
I just remembered another play in this game I needed some help on. In the second half a Mizzou player is fouled on the shot, it is the defender's 5th. The defender apparently said something to, or bumped into an official (never showed any replay or got clarification) and got a T. Missouri shoots two shots, then shoots two technicals, then Auburn inbounds. I was very confused. What circumstances would result in Auburn getting the ball back after a T has been called?

Most technical fouls in NCAA-M are two shots and play resumed at POI, not two shots and the ball to the offended team.

bob jenkins Mon Jan 13, 2014 02:06pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by #olderthanilook (Post 918045)
Is this a situation that the SEC assignor will review with the official(s)? I hate seeing any official make mistakes that could result in harsh reprimand and/or consequences. But, that mismanagement of the game was a pretty big deal. I'm somewhat surprised the Auburn coach hasn't made a big deal about not getting an opportunity for another inbound play that would give his team another chance to tie or win the game.

I don't work the SEC, so I'm only speculating, but -- officials are reviewed after almost every game, and it would not surprise me if they all got a downgrade for this (and maybe lose a game). And, there are procedures for a coach to raise this issue -- and those do NOT include "making a big deal" our of it publically.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ballgame99 (Post 918054)
I just remembered another play in this game I needed some help on. In the second half a Mizzou player is fouled on the shot, it is the defender's 5th. The defender apparently said something to, or bumped into an official (never showed any replay or got clarification) and got a T. Missouri shoots two shots, then shoots two technicals, then Auburn inbounds. I was very confused. What circumstances would result in Auburn getting the ball back after a T has been called?

Missouri had the ball, Auburn committed a foul, then committed a T and then Auburn inbounded? That doesn't sound correct.

Camron Rust Mon Jan 13, 2014 02:16pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by bob jenkins (Post 918061)
I don't work the SEC, so I'm only speculating, but -- officials are reviewed after almost every game, and it would not surprise me if they all got a downgrade for this (and maybe lose a game). And, there are procedures for a coach to raise this issue -- and those do NOT include "making a big deal" our of it publically.

I'd hope not. Their should be at least one official (and maybe 2) that should have no idea if that player stepped on the line or traveled. I hope they wouldn't get penalized for their partner missing a call.

johnny d Mon Jan 13, 2014 02:23pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by bob jenkins (Post 918061)



Missouri had the ball, Auburn committed a foul, then committed a T and then Auburn inbounded? That doesn't sound correct.


Yes bob, it does.

1. Missouri shoots the two free throws for the T without players lined up.

2. Missouri shoots the two free throws with the players lined up for the shooting foul.

3. Missouri makes the second shot, so Auburn inbounds the ball along the endline after the made free throw.

rockyroad Mon Jan 13, 2014 02:23pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by ballgame99 (Post 918054)
I just remembered another play in this game I needed some help on. In the second half a Mizzou player is fouled on the shot, it is the defender's 5th. The defender apparently said something to, or bumped into an official (never showed any replay or got clarification) and got a T. Missouri shoots two shots, then shoots two technicals, then Auburn inbounds. I was very confused. What circumstances would result in Auburn getting the ball back after a T has been called?

Assuming that the Missouri player made the last free throw, then the POI would be Auburn inbounding the ball from the endline. They should have shot the two Technical free throws first, then brought everyone back into the lane spaces and shot the 2 for the personal foul. Play would resume from there.

Raymond Mon Jan 13, 2014 02:29pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by ballgame99 (Post 918054)
I just remembered another play in this game I needed some help on. In the second half a Mizzou player is fouled on the shot, it is the defender's 5th. The defender apparently said something to, or bumped into an official (never showed any replay or got clarification) and got a T. Missouri shoots two shots, then shoots two technicals, then Auburn inbounds. I was very confused. What circumstances would result in Auburn getting the ball back after a T has been called?

What type of throw-in? Anywhere along the endline or designated spot?

bob jenkins Mon Jan 13, 2014 02:50pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by johnny d (Post 918067)
Yes bob, it does.

1. Missouri shoots the two free throws for the T without players lined up.

2. Missouri shoots the two free throws with the players lined up for the shooting foul.

3. Missouri makes the second shot, so Auburn inbounds the ball along the endline after the made free throw.

ah -- yes. I was thinking that there were no players lined up for the FTs and Auburn inbounded at the spot of the foul, or the division line.

I agree that if it happened as you describe, that's the correct enforcement.

ballgame99 Mon Jan 13, 2014 03:56pm

I guess I just don't see a lot of technicals in college then. Because everyone above is correct, they shot the two technicals with the lane clear, and then two free throws with the lane full and played on.

In NFHS you would do it the opposite wouldn't you? Shoot the two shots for the shooting foul, then two techs, and then the shooting team gets the ball at division line?

rockyroad Mon Jan 13, 2014 04:00pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by ballgame99 (Post 918103)
I guess I just don't see a lot of technicals in college then. Because everyone above is correct, they shot the two technicals with the lane clear, and then two free throws with the lane full and played on.

In NFHS you would do it the opposite wouldn't you? Shoot the two shots for the shooting foul, then two techs, and then the shooting team gets the ball at division line?

Yes. In NFHS you penalize in the order they occurred.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:24am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1