Florida Gulf Coast vs S Florida - 0.3 sec shot

[dahoopref]

This is about as close as it gets!

Good job by the crew to remind both teams that a field goal would only count as long as the ball is tipped by FGCU.

Enjoy.

[grunewar]

Thanks for posting. Was hoping someone would.

According to ESPN, the player guarding the inbound pass was 7'3"!

[bwburke94]

Art. 18. In any period, when the game clock displays 10ths of seconds and play is to be resumed by a throw-in or a free throw when 3/10 (.3) of a second or less remains on the game clock, a player may not gain possession of the ball and try for a field goal. Such player can only score a field goal by means of a tap of a pass or of a missed free throw.

[APG]

Originally Posted by bwburke94

Art. 18. In any period, when the game clock displays 10ths of seconds and play is to be resumed by a throw-in or a free throw when 3/10 (.3) of a second or less remains on the game clock, a player may not gain possession of the ball and try for a field goal. Such player can only score a field goal by means of a tap of a pass or of a missed free throw.

Same in NFHS..NBA one can catch and shoot with .3 on the clock...with .2 or less, only a tap.

[Camron Rust]

Pretty simple call by rule.

Of course, it could be argued that it is possible to catch and release such a shot in less than 0.3 seconds even if it isn't possible to do so on a normal jumpshot. But that would be a discussion for another day.

I just want to know why the official was over at the monitor after the shot was waived off. If the clock started on 0.3, there really isn't anything to be reviewed. I don't think that reviewing whether a player caught the ball or tapped the ball is a reviewable decision.

[JetMetFan]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

I just want to know why the official was over at the monitor after the shot was waived of. If the clock started on 0.3, there really isn't anything to be reviewed. I don't think that reviewing whether a player caught the ball or tapped the ball is a reviewable decision.

It’s mandatory under both NCAA codes. Since they made a call on the court – the 3/10 ruling – in a game-ending situation that determined the outcome of the contest the monitor review rule kicked in. Yeah, I know, by rule it’s not a try because the 3/10s rule exists but the monitor part is on the books (NCAA 11-3-1a.1)

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by JetMetFan

It’s mandatory under both NCAA codes. Since they made a call on the court – the 3/10 ruling – in a game-ending situation that determined the outcome of the contest the monitor review rule kicked in. Yeah, I know, by rule it’s not a try because the 3/10s rule exists but the monitor part is on the books (NCAA 11-3-1a.1)

I know that. But isn't that review is to see if it was released before time expired. In this case, it can't be, by rule. The video can't change that. Are they allowed to change the ruling of catch vs. tap?

[Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

Pretty simple call by rule.

Of course, it could be argued that it is possible to catch and release such a shot in less than 0.3 seconds even if it isn't possible to do so on a normal jumpshot. But that would be a discussion for another day.

I just want to know why the official was over at the monitor after the shot was waived of. If the clock started on 0.3, there really isn't anything to be reviewed. I don't think that reviewing whether a player caught the ball or tapped the ball is a reviewable decision.

Camron:

I agree with you. This is a good example of a long 0.3 seconds on the clock (0.39 seconds) as opposed to a short 0.3 seconds on the clock (0.31 seconds).

MTD, Sr.

[JugglingReferee]

Superb video for training purposes.

[A Pennsylvania Coach]

Originally Posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.

Camron:

I agree with you. This is a good example of a long 0.3 seconds on the clock (0.30 seconds) as opposed to a short 0.3 seconds on the clock (0.21 seconds).

MTD, Sr.

Fixed your post

[johnny d]

Originally Posted by dahoopref

This is about as close as it gets!

Nothing close about this play at all. Rule is clear. Player clearly caught the ball. Game over. What is close?

[Scrapper1]

Originally Posted by dahoopref

Good job by the crew to remind both teams that a field goal would only count as long as the ball is tipped by FGCU.

1) I don't see where the officials are reminding the teams of this. Is there a spot in the video where you can see this?

2) When are you going to remind them? You're not going into the time-out huddle, are you?

[Scrapper1]

Any chance somebody could rip this video and email it to me as a file? I have the "Youtube Downloader" extention in my Chrome browser, but it doesn't work anymore.

Or at least let me know how I can rip it myself? Thanks.

[referee99]

Wondershare AllMyTube (Mac)