Administrative Technicals

[Sharpshooternes]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

You are still not showing rules support for this position.

Peace

Good lord JRut. Are you seriously going to shoot TFT on both ends because of a double foul and both players aren't in the book! And because the scorekeeper realizes that neither players are in the book. You decide to do 2 TF not at the same time. Whack A! Whack B! A because we noticed that you weren't in the book first B will shoot then A is going to shoot and then we are going to give the ball at the division line to B which isn't at all a disadvantage to you because we saw your error first. And this definitely did not happen at approximately the same time. So let's just hold up the game and shoot some FTs and give possession to B, even though you, A, had the ball before the double foul. Nope not an unfair disadvantage at all, A. Good hell, double foul, double team tech, POI. Play ball. Close the thread.

[Coach Bill]

Originally Posted by Sharpshooternes

Good lord JRut. Are you seriously going to shoot TFT on both ends because of a double foul and both players aren't in the book! And because the scorekeeper realizes that neither players are in the book. You decide to do 2 TF not at the same time. Whack A! Whack B! A because we noticed that you weren't in the book first B will shoot then A is going to shoot and then we are going to give the ball at the division line to B which isn't at all a disadvantage to you because we saw your error first. And this definitely did not happen at approximately the same time. So let's just hold up the game and shoot some FTs and give possession to B, even though you, A, had the ball before the double foul. Nope not an unfair disadvantage at all, A. Good hell, double foul, double team tech, POI. Play ball. Close the thread.

I think JRut's still stuck on the OP, not the double personal foul, which resulted in simultaneous T's, which, by rule, no free throws, POI.