![]() |
What is the difference between a flagrant and technical foul?
|
A flagrant can be a technical or personal foul and always results in an ejection.
|
Tony's response if for high school basketball. It occurred to me that you might be watching the NBA. If you are talking about NBA rules, they seem to use the term flagrant the way HS uses intentional.
|
Quote:
|
Flargrant usually implies violent or savage. ooh
4-19 art. 4. Personal or technical of a violent or savage nature... or a technical noncontact file which displays unacceptable conduct. Also according to the quiz, coming in after being disqualified is a flagrent technical foul.
|
Re: Flargrant usually implies violent or savage. ooh
Quote:
|
Re: Flargrant usually implies violent or savage. ooh
Quote:
|
Re: Re: Flargrant usually implies violent or savage. ooh
Quote:
|
The importance is that Nevada, like many other states, makes the kid sit out the next game if he receives an ejection, (ie flagrant T, or two Ts) as opposed to just being disqualified (fouling out).
Oh, good job, JR, you beat me to it. |
Quote:
Just remember, folks, in NF rules there is no such thing as an ejection: "A disqualified player is one who is barred from further participation in the game because of having committed his/her fifth foul (personal and technical), two technical fouls or a flagrant foul." (4-14-1) The different penalties for different types of disqualifications do often hold true, though. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:12pm. |