It's an NCAA football-based story but it would affect basketball as well
|
Maybe they ought to just make the BCS conferences the Minor Leagues of the NFL and pay the players like they already are. :rolleyes:
The big question in my mind is how long will each sport only have one rule book? I can envision a time where there is a rule book for the "Super Conferences" and another for everybody else. |
All of this I heard, I do not see this changing anything major but money and rules (not playing rules) in which things are done. The NCAA Tournament makes too much money and football is already running on its own basically. Football drives the bus and the NCAA does not run a tournament for football at the major college level. What may happen is what rules a Big Ten or and SEC does in paying players or recruiting, but I do not see it changing where they break off. For one braking off would have consequences and might put more liability on many areas to those schools they did not anticipate. I think the Big 5 are tired of rules with recruiting and how schools get penalized and that is part of the problem here. Also keep in mind the NCAA decided to not endorse another video game for college football and reports say that EA Sports can go through these schools and make a game with all the logos and backgrounds without the NCAA's blessing. This is mostly about money and who has power. And right now a school that does not have a football team can vote on things that influence a major program that makes millions every year. I think that is really what this is about at this time.
Peace |
Until our country decides that higher education should have nothing to do with running a major sports program as a source of revenue, then we will have this debate. Are they students who compete for enjoyment, school pride, a social activity, and a break from studies or are they really a farm system for the professional sports leagues and just a revenue stream for these institutions?
What exactly is the connection between higher education and athletics anyway? It won't happen any time soon, but an act of congress which bans sports on TV would collapse this system. Take the big money out of it and watch the schools get out of having these sports teams and big stadiums. |
Student Athletes ...
My daughter played Division III soccer, and my son ran Division II cross country. Both were real student athletes, as were all their teammates, and all their opponents.
|
Quote:
Thanks for making my point. |
Right Back At You ...
Quote:
|
Quote:
You have been visited by Mr. Spelling Guy. |
Stupid Spellcheck ...
Quote:
"I love how crazy this has sent people. It was to annoy English teachers and grammar Nazis." (Labrinth) <iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/bqIxCtEveG8" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> |
Wondering if this is a basketball officiating forum or a quasi English grammar forum?
|
Quote:
Yes |
Grammar, Spelling, Math, History, Physics, Music, Cinema, The Forum Has It All ...
Quote:
|
Quote:
The problem now is the arms race. The schools with resources get better and better facilities and the smaller schools can't keep up. Without knowing it or intending it, the larger schools are putting the smaller schools in a place where soon they won't be able to compete but still have to field teams for the large schools to play. Having no competitors in business is great but in athletics, it sucks. For example: Texas A&M and Rice used to be in the same conference and played home and home games every year. Now, Rice is a home "check" game for A&M -- Rice comes to College Station and A&M writes them a check -- which is for more money than Rice will get for staging a home game. These kinds of games aren't new, but then they weren't common between 2 schools that 20 years prior were in the same conference. Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:34pm. |