Duke-Louisville no call travel clip (Dieng 2nd half)
 

<iframe width="853" height="480" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/n94phpS3114?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Pretty clear travel to me, but I want to hear what JRut says.

Does anyone think there might be a foul 7 seconds into this clip (13:49 game time)?

Travel. I thought it was a travel when I saw it live also.

Looks like a travel. Re: the foul, I don't see a definite foul because of the camera angle, but the play is suspect for a foul, that's for sure.

I don't see a travel.
 

Play on.

I think the issue is whether the officials think there is control. And control is certainly at issue here. I was thinking travel when I saw this at first but can understand why it was not called.

Peace

I like the no call. Possession occurs as his momentum is rolling over (helped by a defender).

You are only permitted to roll over with the ball during a slide. On this play if you have judged the Dieng rolled over with the ball then you have to rule a travelling violation.

I thought it was a travel because Dieng rolled away from the Duke player. There were probably a couple fouls that the L passed on prior to the ball becoming loose.

He almost made it 360 degrees in that roll. That is a travel.

+1