You can call me, text me or email me and I will tell you what I know. I have second hand information and the subject is too volatile for me to mention it here.

...but if you keep poking I will keep dropping hints...:D

Haha

My info would be 2nd hand also. Funny you talk about it being too volatile to mention here. My source didn't want to put anything in an email, said he'd only tell me face-to-face. His comments were before Boudreaux fired. He said some mess was going on. He didn't say what it concerned (other than the Pac 12 story wasn't over), but his buddy is a big dawg in the SEC amongst other conferences.

Had to replace my phone this week so I lost all my numbers. I'll message you on Facebook.

We don't need everything thread turned into something about the mods. Keep to the subject. If you want to complain, you have my email.

I keep hearing this said ... but with zero details. The story seems pretty over to me, especially since those that keep acting like there is some other smoking gun don't have a clue as to what it is.

Theres no transparency when it comes to people saying a particular ref is awlful. We dont see their ratings on how they go there. We nitpick at the missed/no calls, and then trash them on the board. It makes no sense to me. People just want to trash other people and not be honest.

Seems that some of the officials(sources) are disputing the PAC 12 finding that Rush was joking. They are saying he was serious, and the PAC 12 is looking again.

They have said that from the first article — doesn't make it true necessarily either.

"After considering the matter, commissioner Scott and I agree that an independent review is important to maintain the confidence of our members, and of the public, in the integrity of our competition"

I consider this completely standard — seems prudent so that they can put everything behind them.