![]() |
BI on Joakim Noah (video)
|
<iframe width="640" height="360" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/NKg7O9fmQYo?feature=player_embedded" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Correct call of goaltending made by the crew in real time and confirmed by replay |
One announcer so badly wants it to be the wrong call:)
|
I thought GT on the original angle. It's not as though the ball was going to change direction without any help.
If Noah had any guts, he would've told his coach he touched it so the guy wouldn't have nearly burst a blood vessel when the crew made its ruling. |
What's the rule that came into play here? Looked to me like the ball was halfway in the cylinder, if that makes sense.
|
Quote:
No player may not touch the ball anytime a ball, from the playing area, is on its downward flight with a chance a score. |
Quote:
Seems pretty black and white to me. |
Quote:
|
Bulls fans need to ask themselves, would they have wanted goaltending if a defender had gone up and swatted that ball away? If so, then the offensive guy can't go up and do the same thing, right? That ball looked a bit short, but it still had a chance.
|
And it's a violation in NFHs rule set also. Makes no distinction as to whether it's an offensive or defensive player:
Rule: 4-22 Goaltending occurs when a player touches the ball during a field-goal try or tap while it is in its downward flight entirely above the basket ring level and has the possibility of entering the basket in flight, or an opponent of the free thrower touches the ball outside the cylinder during a free-throw attempt. |
Obviously goaltending, but was Thibodeau more upset over the no call a couple plays earlier when Denver did a similar act?
|
Blatant goaltending, and idiotic commentary --- even by commentary's normal standards of idiocy.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
My thought process...
... downward flight... chance to go in. Pretty simple.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:26pm. |