Has anyone seen the new wording on "legal guarding position" must have both feet IB

[RecRef]

Originally posted by MO_Ref
This is my first post, so I don't know how much help this will be. The link below is to discussion regarding the same topic. Thought you might want to know.
http://www.nfhs.org/cgi-bin/ultimate...;f=11;t=000019

First, welcome to the board.
From the above:

"BktBallRef
Member
Member # 251"

As the old saying goes, "He's everywhere, he’s everywhere.”


Now to the subject. LGP is only one part of the block/charge scenario. There could well be a charge even if there never was LGP as the dribbler or any other player can’t just run over someone else.

I personally have some problems with the new editorial comments and hope we see a further clarification. What about the 3ft rule? Are we going to allow a collision (call a block) because B1 has his foot on the line? This when A1 has had many steps to avoid the contact? Not in my book. Want to talk about ruff play?