Minnesota/Wisconsin Block/charge and Out of bounds travel

[HawkeyeCubP]

The announcer is completely wrong in the RA rule. The rule involves being in or over the RA, of which the entire line is a part of. (Big surprise there.)

[APG]

Originally Posted by HawkeyeCubP

The announcer is completely wrong in the RA rule. The rule involves being in or over the RA, of which the entire line is a part of. (Big surprise there.)

Yup he's dead wrong in his interpretation there and he'd be wrong under NBA rules as well.

[paulsonj72]

OK now what do you have on the charge. To me it looked like the UW player did not have LGP and moved in while the UM player was in the air. But what do you have

[HawkeyeCubP]

Originally Posted by paulsonj72

OK now what do you have on the charge. To me it looked like the UW player did not have LGP and moved in while the UM player was in the air. But what do you have

NCAA RA block. HS player control.

[stiffler3492]

Is B1 not still moving forward, towards A1, after A1 jumped?

[bob jenkins]

Glad to see the official used the correct signal on the throw-in violation.

[JugglingReferee]

I like both calls.

However, the throw-in should have been from the C's side of the key - the opposite side from where the ball was inbounded.

[SNIPERBBB]

Originally Posted by stiffler3492

Is B1 not still moving forward, towards A1, after A1 jumped?

Looks to me like B1 is straightening his body and not moving towards A1.

[jTheUmp]

I watched it live, and thought it was a block, as I thought the defender was moving towards the offensive player when the contact occurred. The replays I saw did nothing to dissuade me of my notion. (and no, I'm not a Minnesota homer).

The throw-in violation surprised the hell out of me when it happened, in a "did he really just do that?" kind of way.