Ohio State v. Michigan

[JRutledge]

Need two plays in the last 7 seconds clipped up.

7.6 there is a foul to the face on after a rebound. The officials went to the monitor. You could even show the shot that resulted in the rebound.

Last shot by OSU, contact and no foul called. I think it was a good call.

Peace

Originally Posted by JRutledge

7.6 there is a foul to the face on after a rebound. The officials went to the monitor. You could even show the shot that resulted in the rebound.

Last shot by OSU, contact and no foul called. I think it was a good call.

Play #1: Flagrant 1

Play #2: Good no call on the shot. I have a handcheck on the drive with 4 seconds left.

[VaTerp]

Originally Posted by seanwestref

Play #1: Flagrant 1

Play #2: Good no call on the shot. I have a handcheck on the drive with 4 seconds left.

You call and signal a handcheck in this situation and it will be one of the last calls you make at that level.

[Multiple Sports]

Are you guys that saying that play two is a hand check really gonna make that call in OSU / UM with four seconds to go.

In 24 hrs you would go from Chysler Arena and $ 3,000 a game to 10 u boys at the local Y for $25 a game.....

Now who wants to make that call??????

[dahoopref]

Originally Posted by Multiple Sports

Are you guys that saying that play two is a hand check really gonna make that call in OSU / UM with four seconds to go.

In 24 hrs you would go from Chysler Arena and $ 3,000 a game to 10 u boys at the local Y for $25 a game.....

Now who wants to make that call??????

CBS interview with NCAA director of officiating

This mentality of not calling a foul near the end of the game is in need of change. John Adams is trying to change that but it seems a lot of my fellow brethren are resistant to it.

I am also aware that certain conference supervisors don't agree with Mr. Adams' and address their staff how they want their conference games officiated. It puts the officials in a difficult situation and that is very unfortunate.

[yooperbballref]

On the drive in, I would defently say there was contact there but was it enough to call? questionable.... The blocked shot was clean IMO.

I think the Mich player was playing defence on the drive very aggressively for the fact that they were not yet in the bounus.

[scrounge]

I think Play #1 was a flagrant that went uncalled, with play #2 a foul - defender got him on the arm and top of head before the ball. But a no-call doesn't surprise me in that situation, it wasn't that blatant. But it was a foul.

[JRutledge]

I did not think that Play #1 was a FF1 as the rules do not support that call explicitly. I am not even sure I would call that in a HS game with those rules either.

c. Flagrant 1 personal foul. A flagrant 1 personal foul shall be a personal foul that is deemed excessive in nature and/or unnecessary, but not based solely on the severity of the act. Examples include, but are not limited to:

1. Causing excessive contact with an opponent while playing the ball;

2. Contact that is not a legitimate attempt to play the ball or player, specifically designed to stop or keep the clock from starting;

3. Pushing or holding a player from behind to prevent a score;

4. Fouling a player clearly away from the ball who is not directly involved with the play, specifically designed to stop or keep the clock from starting; and

5. Contact with a player making a throw-in. (Women) This act shall also serve as a team warning for reaching through the boundary. (See Rule 4-17.1.g.)

6. Illegal contact with an elbow that occurs above the shoulders of an opponent when the elbows are not swung excessively per 4-36.7.a.


Peace

[APG]

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

I did not think that Play #1 was a FF1 as the rules do not support that call explicitly. I am not even sure I would call that in a HS game with those rules either.

c. Flagrant 1 personal foul. A flagrant 1 personal foul shall be a personal foul that is deemed excessive in nature and/or unnecessary, but not based solely on the severity of the act. Examples include, but are not limited to:

1. Causing excessive contact with an opponent while playing the ball;

That one pretty much cover it....excessive contact.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

That one pretty much cover it....excessive contact.

I do not consider contact to the face to be necessarily excessive, when the player does not go to the floor or was not an unusual basketball play.

Players are hit in the face all the time on shots and hardly anyone rules excessive contact when that occurs.

Peace

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by scrounge

...with play #2 a foul - defender got him on the arm and top of head before the ball. But a no-call doesn't surprise me in that situation, it wasn't that blatant. But it was a foul.

While I'll agree with you on the arm, the contact with the head was not until after the ball was knocked free.

[scrounge]

Even Michigan players thought it was a foul...

"I saw the ball in my face, so I just tried to wrap it up," Hardaway said. "Probably got his arm or something like that, but like I said, it's up to the refs to call that call, and they let it go."

[sigh]

NCAA College Basketball Recap - Ohio State Buckeyes at Michigan Wolverines - Feb 05, 2013 - CBSSports.com

[bob jenkins]

No FF1.

No foul.