Alabama vs Tennessee - 1/26/13

grunewar

Can someone post film of the last shot of the game?

Good no call or not?

JetMetFan

I stopped watching after the shooter traveled. Maybe the C did too 😀

JugglingReferee

I have nothing.

Forksref

Is there a problem with 4 steps after the last dribble? 😉

Raymond

I have a travel then a foul.

bob jenkins

They'll have to add "ball goes OOB" to the last-second monitor review criteria.

twocentsworth

that's a foul that should have been called.

scrounge

I got a whole lot 'o nuthin'.

APG

Foul

JRutledge

I could see why a foul would be called, but I got nothing as the shooter tries to create contact by jumping directly into the shooter.

Peace

OKREF

Travel, and no foul.

Camron Rust

Foul. The shooter may have jumped towards he defender but also towards the basket.....a completely reasonable way for a shooter to jump. The defender was no where close to being legal.

JRutledge

Camron Rust wrote
Foul. The shooter may have jumped towards he defender but also towards the basket.....a completely reasonable way for a shooter to jump. The defender was no where close to being legal.

I agree he was not legal, but that also does not mean the shooter is extra special protection when you jump into someone. Not saying that I completely disagree with the point of view that this could be a foul, but when you jump into someone and they are not moving directly into you, I can see the no call. It is like the guy sticking out his leg and trying to get contact with the leg to get a foul. It is a little cheesy IMO.

Peace

Rich

A foul here would be nothing more than bailing out the shooter. After he traveled, too.

APG

Rich wrote
A foul here would be nothing more than bailing out the shooter. After he traveled, too.

Or the other viewpoint could be the offensive player did a good job of inducing the player into a position that wasn't legal and you're bailing out the defender.

All of this, of course, being independent of any action that occurred before the shot.

Rich

APG wrote
Or the other viewpoint could be the offensive player did a good job of inducing the player into a position that wasn't legal and you're bailing out the defender.

All of this, of course, being independent of any action that occurred before the shot.

Could be. Wasn't my first reaction, however. I only watched the video once.