The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   Basketball rule (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/92946-basketball-rule.html)

MIC Fri Nov 16, 2012 03:19pm

Basketball rule
 
Is it a legal move to feign to throw the ball in your opponents face, as a way of getting past them? I've heard different things about this (as technically a foul isn't commited) but it seems very unsportsmanlike to me!

Thanks in advance

jeremy341a Fri Nov 16, 2012 03:30pm

Used to play with a kid in high school that did this. It was usually pretty effective! The Jason Peter's fake as it was self named.

MIC Fri Nov 16, 2012 04:03pm

Legal or illegal move do you think? I haven't watched much professional basketball but I don't remember seeing it outside of public courts.

Adam Fri Nov 16, 2012 04:04pm

Bush league isn't necessarily illegal. Some things police themselves.

MIC Fri Nov 16, 2012 04:10pm

Would you say professionals wouldn't do it because it's unsportsmanlike?

MIC Fri Nov 16, 2012 04:20pm

Am teaching basketball and am really annoyed seeing some students take advantage of this move. Want to get my facts straight before I take them to task :)

APG Fri Nov 16, 2012 04:28pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by MIC (Post 862468)
Would you say professionals wouldn't do it because it's unsportsmanlike?

The only time I remember a player doing this at the professional level was Matt Barnes (when he was with the Orlando Magic) against Kobe Bryant on a throw-in. Kobe Bryant didn't flinch. It's not something you'll really see a lot period.

As to the legality, as long as there's no contact, I see nothing illegal about this tacit.

MIC Fri Nov 16, 2012 05:00pm

Thanks for your replies,

Just watched Barnes Kobe on you tube. Interesting that there is clearly bad blood between the two players.

Would anyone agree that this move is probably legal, but wouldn't ordinarily be used in normal gameplay - i.e. it might be used between two players who are goading each other but doing it on court to every opposing player all the time to gain some advantage is not in the spirit of the game? (It would cause most people to flinch for a split second afterall)

It's like in soccer if someone kept throwing ghost punches at opposing players but not hitting them. At a certain point, it's just bad sportsmanship isn't it?

BktBallRef Fri Nov 16, 2012 05:25pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by MIC (Post 862475)
It's like in soccer if someone kept throwing ghost punches at opposing players but not hitting them. At a certain point, it's just bad sportsmanship isn't it?

Completely different situation. Throwing a punch results in an ejection, whether you make contact or not, in soccer, basketball or most any other sport at the amateur level.

Faking a throw to the face is not illegal. However, if this is going on, there maybe other unsporting acts to follow. It would definitely scream, "Keep an eye on my me!"

MD Longhorn Fri Nov 16, 2012 05:26pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by MIC (Post 862475)
Thanks for your replies,

Just watched Barnes Kobe on you tube. Interesting that there is clearly bad blood between the two players.

Would anyone agree that this move is probably legal, but wouldn't ordinarily be used in normal gameplay - i.e. it might be used between two players who are goading each other but doing it on court to every opposing player all the time to gain some advantage is not in the spirit of the game? (It would cause most people to flinch for a split second afterall)

It's like in soccer if someone kept throwing ghost punches at opposing players but not hitting them. At a certain point, it's just bad sportsmanship isn't it?

This move in basketball against a decent opponent seems like a great way to have the ball popped out of your hands.

And no - swinging a fist in soccer is illegal whether you connect or not.

Adam Fri Nov 16, 2012 05:41pm

Players don't do it at higher levels because it doesn't work when the defender knows the thrower can't actually throw it at his head.
That would definitely be a T. In a little kids game, I'd probably warn and whack as the ref. AFAIC, it's a threat.

MIC Fri Nov 16, 2012 08:12pm

Fair points all, thanks for that :)

bainsey Sat Nov 17, 2012 12:21am

Quote:

Originally Posted by MD Longhorn (Post 862478)
...swinging a fist in soccer is illegal whether you connect or not.

Exactly. Swing-and-a-miss -- particularly with the elbow -- is a yellow card. Swing-and-contact is a red.

Having said that, I haven't seen the fake ball to the face much in these parts, but it sure sounds unsportsmanlike to me.

Nevadaref Sat Nov 17, 2012 12:51am

Quote:

Originally Posted by bainsey (Post 862532)
Exactly. Swing-and-a-miss -- particularly with the elbow -- is a yellow card. Swing-and-contact is a red.

Both would result in a red.

Tio Mon Nov 19, 2012 02:43pm

I think this is a good example of where preventative officiating can fix the problem. I would call the player on it and tell him not to do it. Next time he does it then call a technical foul. Definitely unsporting move and could escalate in a hurry if he hits someone.

MD Longhorn Mon Nov 19, 2012 02:49pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tio (Post 862795)
I think this is a good example of where preventative officiating can fix the problem. I would call the player on it and tell him not to do it. Next time he does it then call a technical foul. Definitely unsporting move and could escalate in a hurry if he hits someone.

At very little ages (like, 10YO), I can see that (although I would not). At older ages, this is a good example of where not inventing a rule is a good idea. The perceived "problem" is not a problem in reality. The act described is not against the rules, and is no more unsporting than any other fake pass.

Tio Mon Nov 19, 2012 02:59pm

I think it would be helpful to see the play, but you are well within your rights to penalize with a Technical foul if you deem the action an "unsporting act." I personally, would prefer to talk to the player to resolve the issue... if you can avoid someone getting hit in the face with the ball, it will make the rest of the game much easier versus a potential flashpoint.

Luckily, a good defender would rip the ball out and that is why you don't see this move often. It is more likely on a save of an OOB play, but hard to penalize....

MD Longhorn Mon Nov 19, 2012 04:01pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tio (Post 862801)
I think it would be helpful to see the play, but you are well within your rights to penalize with a Technical foul if you deem the action an "unsporting act." I personally, would prefer to talk to the player to resolve the issue... if you can avoid someone getting hit in the face with the ball, it will make the rest of the game much easier versus a potential flashpoint.

Luckily, a good defender would rip the ball out and that is why you don't see this move often. It is more likely on a save of an OOB play, but hard to penalize....

I guess I'm not getting why anyone would consider this non-sporting at any real age. I see no issue for you to resolve ... and instead see that if you decide to invent a rule and warn someone not to do something that's not illegal - you have then made it an issue.

I agree that if you can avoid someone getting in the face with a ball, that's nice. But there are a lot of other places it would be good to avoid getting hit with the ball - and you don't see anyone T'ing up a guy for faking a pass in that direction, do you?

Adam Mon Nov 19, 2012 04:24pm

I don't think this is making up a rule so much as applying one. If I see it as a legitimate threat, I'd rather deal with it early. Older players know how to deal with this, so the threshold is higher, but I don't think we should allow one player to intimidate his opponent with an implied threat.

Is it that different than faking an elbow or punch?

MIC Sat Nov 24, 2012 08:48am

Am slightly surprised that anyone would consider this an acceptable part of the game at any age.

By the way, I do appreciate further comments on this as this forum looks the most likely place on the net to get insight on this phenomenon which is prevalent certainly in the non professional game and there is clearly something to debate here.

To clarify my situation:

First, I am dealing with younger players who are not very good in the grand scheme of things.

“This move in basketball against a decent opponent seems like a great way to have the ball popped out of your hands.”

There is no way that my players on the receiving end of this threat would be good enough to steal the ball from the outreached hands as has been suggested might be possible in a higher level game. The offending player gets an instant advantage requiring no skill to get this advantage.

Second, and given the choice, I would much rather someone punched me in the face than threw a basketball in my face. The same goes with the threat of either action. A punch (by a 16 year old) might end up with a simple bloody nose, a b'ball popped in to the face would be a broken nose and therefore the threat is worse and certainly more cowardly.

As far as I'm concerned, basketball is a skill game and I don't get the skill in threatening to break someone's nose.

From MD Longhorn: "there are a lot of other places it would be good to avoid getting hit with the ball - and you don't see anyone T'ing up a guy for faking a pass in that direction, do you?"

I’ve never seen anyone try this so I can’t comment. It would be a threat (and an act of cowardice) with a similar level of consequences (the player on the receiving end would be put out of the game if it was followed through with). The threat should carry the same penalty as if the act was carried through with.

On the Bryant Barnes example, interesting that Barnes attempted to fake out Bryant from a dead ball situation (i.e. not in open play). Did he think he was more likely to get away with this while the ball was not in open play (before the whistle had gone) and hasn’t one of the refs got his hand on Barnes’ arm after the incident, presumably to warn him?

The Barnes example is the only one anyone has mentioned so far. Is this because this just doesn’t happen as much in pro ball? It certainly does at lower levels, doing nothing to protect truly skillful players. This being my aim.

And surely isn’t the reason we don’t see it too much in pro ball that pro players know it’s a cowardly thing to do and they would get called on it, not just by referees, but players, coaches and fans?

If this is true, shouldn’t we have the same standard when reffing and teaching young players how to play (and win) with skill?

APG Sat Nov 24, 2012 11:16am

Quote:

Originally Posted by MIC (Post 863263)

And surely isn’t the reason we don’t see it too much in pro ball that pro players know it’s a cowardly thing to do and they would get called on it, not just by referees, but players, coaches and fans?

If this is true, shouldn’t we have the same standard when reffing and teaching young players how to play (and win) with skill?

No. The reason you don't see this in pro ball is it's a waste of time. It might work once...then the next time you try it, you'll lose possession of it someway or another.

Adam Sat Nov 24, 2012 11:39am

Quote:

Originally Posted by APG (Post 863269)
No. The reason you don't see this in pro ball is it's a waste of time. It might work once...then the next time you try it, you'll lose possession of it someway or another.

Agreed, and while I agree with MIC that this could be seen as a threat similar faking (not throwing) a punch, I completely disagree that it's prevalent in ball at any level. I work a good amount of youth ball, and I don't see it more than once every few years. If it's happening in a given area often enough to warrant a complaint, then that's poor coaching.

Teach your kids that it's an empty threat, if the officials aren't doing anything. If the fake brings the ball over the boundary line, teach them to grab it.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:49pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1