Heat/Celtics Game 4 Request

[ballgame99]

Foul on wade, did not maintain verticality imo;
thought the double foul was weak, should have been a no-call, Garnett was not the primary reason LBJ ended up on the ground, gravity was;
offensive foul on LBJ, thought this was a great call.

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by ballgame99

...
offensive foul on LBJ, thought this was a great call.

Why, what did LBJ do?

[ballgame99]

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

Why, what did LBJ do?

The defender had established his position on the floor and James removed him from it by contact. What are you suggesting is the right call? I don't see how it could be a foul on the defender, and a no-call doesn't look appropriate to me either.

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by ballgame99

The defender had established his position on the floor and James removed him from it by contact. What are you suggesting is the right call? I don't see how it could be a foul on the defender, and a no-call doesn't look appropriate to me either.

From the angles I saw Petrius wrapped LBJ and pulled him down. Maybe it looked different from Joey C's angle.

[rockyroad]

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

From the angles I saw Petrius wrapped LBJ and pulled him down. Maybe it looked different from Joey C's angle.

Looks more like James grabs and then pins Petrius' arm to his (James) side and then tries to back him down quickly, imo.

[Jay R]

The league must have been OK witht the call. Joe is CC tonight in OKC.

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by Jay R

The league must have been OK witht the call. Joe is CC tonight in OKC.

Even if they weren't I don't think it would have affected his status for tonight.

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by ballgame99

Foul on wade, did not maintain verticality imo;
thought the double foul was weak, should have been a no-call, Garnett was not the primary reason LBJ ended up on the ground, gravity was;
offensive foul on LBJ, thought this was a great call.

I concur.