The Official Forum
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   Call on the court = Block. Your opinion? (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/90458-call-court-block-your-opinion.html)

7IronRef Thu Apr 12, 2012 01:45pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 837068)
For the record, I had not said anything to you since your last post until today. I have not said anything to you because as I said you are a non-MF factor to me. You came back and commented about something after you claim I wanted the last word. Now you are still talking about me after several days have past. We have even gone on with the conversation of the OP and you came back still talking. So if I have not let it go, as I said look in the mirror.



Are you sure? I might bring it up because someone else makes a joke about it or comments about it like people like to do. If you have not noticed not too many people take themselves that seriously here including me. Most of us here have nothing to prove to each other as we are secure in ourselves, which you seem to not be very secure in yourself. If you were, you would not worry about what I was thinking on a play and you were too stupid to read that other people agreed with me. You still have not addressed two people that pointed out to you that they did not agree with your assessment on the plays and that others agreed with me, go figure.

You are like a lot of others trolls that have been here and have gone in a week or so when your career either has fallen off or someone figures you out and who you really are.



I do not need to know what your name is at all. But you can look mine up and find it in Illinois that is for sure. And there have been about 20 posts (since page 5) since the last time you was on this thread. Maybe if you would stop acting like a little girl and man up, you would not worry about what I have to say to you at all. If you do not want me to have the last word, say anything to you or acknowledge your existence, then do not talk to me at all. Trust me, you are not that important.

Now back to our regularly scheduled programming. :)

Peace
Yet you still keep commenting, because you know my name, and you cannot let it go. I am in your dome :D

Sorry don't have the time to hang out here all day every day to see if there is something I feel compelled to comment on, unlike yourself. If you have that kind of time, good for you. I spend my off time working, golfing, training, on my boat and with my friends and family. I am not in a long term relationship with the Forum like you (see all of your posts, unless you are getting paid by the post) so I have no doubt that I will move on before you. Just like our officiating careers, I will blow past you, if I haven't already.

I had really thought that this back and forth would have run its course and ended long ago when you said you were done with me back around page 4. But again, I know that you cannot let things go on this Forum. I had lurked on the Forum prior to joining and noticed that you tend to belittle and make back-handed comments about others here whether you are speaking to them or not. So I decided to stay with it. Its just more fun messing with you because you would argue with an echo just to try to have the last word.

The reality is that we disagreed on the play(s) which is what referee's do. With this group the play is basically 50-50.

If you want to whip out resume's, fine by me. I am pretty sure mine is longer and fatter :p

Camron Rust Thu Apr 12, 2012 02:38pm
(liberal use of editing in the quotes below)

Quote:
Originally Posted by rockyroad (Post 837078)
Wow...I thought listening to my 7th graders argue about who was better at bump on the playground was tiring... (snip)
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 837083)
When you have trolls on this site, this happens. At some point people have to be willing to state their opinion and live with it. (snip)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 7IronRef (Post 837092)
Yet you still keep commenting, because you know my name, and you cannot let it go. I am in your dome :D
(snip)
The reality is that we disagreed on the play(s) which is what referee's do. With this group the play is basically 50-50.
What is REALLY funny is that the two actually agreed on the play. :eek: ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 836113)
I have a block on this play. The defender never stops and is coming forward toward the shooter.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 7IronRef (Post 836322)
You rendered your decisions on both calls, and your judgment is incorrect on both. You called one a block and the other a PC. Yes, these are your opinions on both calls, but in both plays the defense is moving into the path of the shooter. In both cases you got it wrong, especially if you subscribe to the teachings of the NCAA, which you claim you do.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 7IronRef (Post 836211)
In both cases the defender is moving forward and into the offense, this time the L started to show...she learned her lesson and was really slow in the C-ship game to avoid the BLARGE
Quote:
Originally Posted by 7IronRef (Post 837092)
If you want to whip out resume's, fine by me. I am pretty sure mine is longer and fatter :p
This is probably the longest argument I've seen where the two sides didn't realize they had actually agreed. It really looks like ONE of the two was more intent on attacking the other rather than discussing the play. Fore!

JetMetFan Thu Apr 12, 2012 04:31pm
I get it now...
 
Quote:
This is probably the longest argument I've seen where the two sides didn't realize they had actually agreed. It really looks like ONE of the two was more intent on attacking the other rather than discussing the play. Fore!
Thanks, CR. I'd lost track of who had what opinion. :D

So I guess that means their disagreement is about the other block/charge play I posted from this game. Maybe I should move their whole string into that post? ;)

dsqrddgd909 Thu Apr 12, 2012 04:33pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by tref (Post 837054)
This argument is so 27 seconds ago :p

Both of you guys post an entire game & let us, the posters of the Forum, make the final call on "whose got game." :D
I haven't seen 7 iron ref, but I have seen JRut work in a game that featured one team that ran the Grinnell system.

Now JRut doesn't need any affirmation from me, but I have seen a lot of games officiated by the best in three different associations and Rut was as good as any I've seen. Very crisp signals, positioning, communication and the man is in very good shape (better than 90% of the officials I have seen or worked with.)

tref Thu Apr 12, 2012 04:36pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsqrddgd909 (Post 837125)
I haven't seen 7 iron ref, but I have seen JRut work in a game that featured one team that ran the Grinnell system.

Now JRut doesn't need any affirmation from me, but I have seen a lot of games officiated by the best in three different associations and Rut was as good as any I've seen. Very crisp signals, positioning, communication and the man is in very good shape (better than 90% of the officials I have seen or worked with.)
I've actually seen a bit of him on the court as well, I believe he posted a link or something to one of his games a couple years back.
From what I remember, he not only looked the part but he had some presence about himself too. I didnt think he was an old timer either...

JRutledge Thu Apr 12, 2012 04:55pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsqrddgd909 (Post 837125)
I haven't seen 7 iron ref, but I have seen JRut work in a game that featured one team that ran the Grinnell system.

Now JRut doesn't need any affirmation from me, but I have seen a lot of games officiated by the best in three different associations and Rut was as good as any I've seen. Very crisp signals, positioning, communication and the man is in very good shape (better than 90% of the officials I have seen or worked with.)
And the fact you say this with our blarge, that must say a lot. ;)

Peace

JRutledge Thu Apr 12, 2012 05:09pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust (Post 837105)
What is REALLY funny is that the two actually agreed on the play. :eek: ...


This is probably the longest argument I've seen where the two sides didn't realize they had actually agreed. It really looks like ONE of the two was more intent on attacking the other rather than discussing the play. Fore!
Actually I have to correct the record a little. You were kind of there but not totally complete in your references.

He was upset that I did not think that both plays that were posted were not seen the exact same and rule both were blocks that JetMetFan posted on the same day. I said one play was a block and the other was a charge. He claimed they were exactly the same and I should have ruled both blocks. He even suggested that the defenders did the exact same thing at the time of contact. Then two regular posters called him on that fact and instead of addressing their comments, he went after me again. My position was the both plays were not the same and why I felt one was a block (I believe in this thread) and the other play was a charge. And then he suggested that someone in their 30s is over the hill and needs to stop officiating, but if I recall this is a person that just started working college ball of any kind and asked a question about what to do in a college situation. I guess because I did not just start working college ball a year ago I am over the hill (sorry but that was the funniest insult). If being in your 30s makes you over the hill, and then most of the officials I work with must be decrepit as most are older than me by more than a few years. And these are very successful officials I am talking about. Most officials younger than me have not broken in to varsity ball or if they work college they are just getting started.

I am glad everyone in entertained but this was funny to me, because I was not talking to him at all in this thread until I was addressed. I do not back down from trolls like this.

Peace

JRutledge Thu Apr 12, 2012 05:11pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by tref (Post 837127)
I've actually seen a bit of him on the court as well, I believe he posted a link or something to one of his games a couple years back.
From what I remember, he not only looked the part but he had some presence about himself too. I didnt think he was an old timer either...
If that was the game that was on "sort of" national TV a few years back at University of Illinois-Chicago for a HS shootout, I was by far the youngest on the crew. Give me a couple of more years and I really am going to be in a wheelchair. :)

Peace

rockyroad Thu Apr 12, 2012 05:25pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 837136)
I am glad everyone in entertained
Who said any of it was entertaining???

I think I made it clear that it was tiring.

JRutledge Thu Apr 12, 2012 05:28pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by rockyroad (Post 837141)
Who said any of it was entertaining???

I think I made it clear that it was tiring.
Well do what a lot of folks do, ignore it. I know I do the same often when people get into it over what people get into it about on this site from time to time.

Actually Billy said it would be entertaining and even showed some popcorn (post #45 on Page 3), but I digress. ;)

Peace

Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. Thu Apr 12, 2012 05:43pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by JetMetFan (Post 836047)
<iframe width="853" height="480" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/wLe7MC-VlRo?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

This particular block/charge was very very close and the drive started from the C's PCA therefore it is his call. That said, the C was pretty much where he should havd been, I would have liked to see him close down as the offensive player drove to the basket, meaning that I don't think he was in the best position to officiate the defense and the L was somewhat straight-lined too, leaving the least likely of the three, the T, with possiblly the best angle to see that this was a charge.

MTD, Sr.

BillyMac Thu Apr 12, 2012 05:46pm
That's Not Entertainment ...
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 837143)
Actually Billy said it would be entertaining and even showed some popcorn.
JRutledge: I apologize for making light of this. Even veteran Forum members can have a difficult time figuring out who the real good officials are on this Forum versus average, or poor officials. Some Forum members can "talk the talk, and walk the walk", others can just "talk the talk". And that's all we do here, is talk. Many of us who have been on the Forum for any length of time may sometimes disagree with you, but I'm sure that most of us realize that you are an official who can probably "walk the walk".

Rookie Forum members have absolutely no idea who can really "walk the walk". Not a clue. I thought for sure that when the new poster "called you out" that you would tear him to shreds, but you didn't, you're too polite, too patient, and too respectful. So it really wasn't very entertaining.

Maybe 7IronRef will eventually earn our respect, after we all get to know him better. Maybe, someday, he'll become an esteemed member, and then we will all look back on this and have a good laugh.

If Jurassic Referee had been around? Now, that would have been entertaining.

JRutledge Thu Apr 12, 2012 06:10pm
Billy,

You are right, if JR was here and a few others, he would have been called a lot more than what I said here for sure. And even if he caught me 7 or 8 years ago I might have done the same. If I have realized anything by this we are kind of in this together. We disagree as we are supposed to disagree. As I said before I use video at one of my association's meetings all the time where I am President, I would get part of the room say one thing and the other saying another. And many would not back down because they see one thing in the video and others see something else. And since I am wrong on one of the plays, it would not be the first time nor the last. Anyone that has been officiating for any length of time knows that.

Peace

Camron Rust Thu Apr 12, 2012 06:44pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 837136)
Actually I have to correct the record a little. You were kind of there but not totally complete in your references.

He was upset that I did not think that both plays that were posted were not seen the exact same and rule both were blocks that JetMetFan posted on the same day. I said one play was a block and the other was a charge. He claimed they were exactly the same and I should have ruled both blocks. He even suggested that the defenders did the exact same thing at the time of contact.
I was attempting to back you up...he did just spend his entire time attacking you for whatever reason...not deserved for sure and incredibly wrong....and spent little to no time on the point.

He did say, somewhere, that you were wrong on both calls (you said one was a block and one was a charge) and he also posted a ruling where he said both were blocks. So, if you were wrong on the one in this thread, he was too, since you had the same ruling. ;)

His statement here is where he contradicts himself...

Quote:
Originally Posted by 7IronRef (Post 836322)
You rendered your decisions on both calls, and your judgment is incorrect on both. You called one a block and the other a PC. Yes, these are your opinions on both calls, but in both plays the defense is moving into the path of the shooter. In both cases you got it wrong, especially if you subscribe to the teachings of the NCAA, which you claim you do.
BTW, you were wrong on the other once since I had the opposite ruling. :D:p

JRutledge Thu Apr 12, 2012 07:06pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust (Post 837153)
I was attempting to back you up...he did just spend his entire time attacking you for whatever reason...not deserved for sure and incredibly wrong....and spent little to no time on the point.

He did say, somewhere, that you were wrong on both calls (you said one was a block and one was a charge) and he also posted a ruling where he said both were blocks. So, if you were wrong on the one in this thread, he was too, since you had the same ruling. ;)
I am so confused anyway because I really never got why it mattered in this thread what I thought about in another play in the first place. I just wanted to clarify that he thought the two plays were exactly the same which was pointed out to him. I was not taking your post as a slam, just wanted to clarify how silly his point was when he was ripping me about another play that was similar, but not the same. And if I was wrong, he really did not seem to notice that many others disagreed with him on how those plays should be ruled. It was all kind of silly and why I called him a troll. If you are trying to have a constructive discussion about these plays there was/is a case to be made on both sides. But he was obviously worried about what I thought more than anyone else.

Peace

Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. Thu Apr 12, 2012 09:51pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by 7IronRef (Post 836322)
You rendered your decisions on both calls, and your judgment is incorrect on both. You called one a block and the other a PC. Yes, these are your opinions on both calls, but in both plays the defense is moving into the path of the shooter. In both cases you got it wrong, especially if you subscribe to the teachings of the NCAA, which you claim you do.

Just keep doing what you typically do, twist things just enough to get off the subject and divert attention from your incorrect rulings.

It's ok to admit your mistakes, learn from it and improve.

7IronRef:

What videos were you watching? And listen up whippersnapper, when you have officiated at the level some of us have the number of years we have then you can take can get snippy with us old codgers (Rut, I apologize for calling you an old codger, but I know you understand the point I making.).

MTD, Sr.

Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. Thu Apr 12, 2012 09:55pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by 7IronRef (Post 837052)
That's what old timers always say. The old "I challenge you to an officiating duel" is next I am sure.

Not that it matters but 33 yr old...you probably can't remember that far back :)

7IronRef:

Big deal, I can quote the appropriate Casebook Plays from 1971 that apply to the two videos we are discussing. Can you?

MTD, Sr.

Adam Thu Apr 12, 2012 10:39pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. (Post 837176)
7IronRef:

Big deal, I can quote the appropriate Casebook Plays from 1971 that apply to the two videos we are discussing. Can you?

MTD, Sr.
Doubtful he can spell "case plays" without copy and paste.

HawkeyeCubP Thu Apr 12, 2012 10:52pm
Everyone has fault, and faults. Rut's "little girl" comment is sexist. Other guy uses lots of inappropriate apostrophes. I'm not as fast as I was when I started working college (see what I did there?). We're all flawed.

Motion to drop this and move on.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:51pm.
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1