The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   VCU v. Indiana (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/89950-vcu-v-indiana.html)

kwv001 Sun Mar 18, 2012 07:46am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lotto (Post 832808)
I'll post the rule (kind of long) below. The interesting thing here is that it seems that in NCAAM, the officials can only go to the monitor to determine if there was a flagrant 2 foul, which clearly did not occur in this case. On the other hand, maybe the coach requested s review?

Thanks for posting. I agree with you...the way this is written, it seems there are only two possibilities for going to replay in this situation. The first, to determine the severity of a fall called for contact wouldn't apply here because there wasn't a foul called on that play. If the rule was properly applied, the only possibility then was that Coach Smart asked them to take a look.

It seems to me though, that the intent here is to use replay to determine the severity of a foul that had been called. I hope we don't get to the day where it is acceptable to use replay to determine if a travelling violation occured...

JetMetFan Sun Mar 18, 2012 09:21am

About 30 seconds into the clip you see the officials speaking with the coach. That's probably when he was making the request since the crew couldn't have gone to the monitor on its own.

If this was NCAAW the crew could've checked on its own since we - women's officials - can check for both F1s and F2s without a coach's request.

kwv001 Sun Mar 18, 2012 10:03am

Quote:

Originally Posted by JetMetFan (Post 832827)
About 30 seconds into the clip you see the officials speaking with the coach. That's probably when he was making the request since the crew couldn't have gone to the monitor on its own.

If this was NCAAW the crew could've checked on its own since we - women's officials - can check for both F1s and F2s without a coach's request.

Any idea what the rationale is for the difference between the men's and women's rule?

Johnny Ringo Sun Mar 18, 2012 11:20am

Do most of you think the outcome was correct? Or could they have resulted in incidental contact, if that is an option?

Camron Rust Sun Mar 18, 2012 12:04pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by kwv001 (Post 832833)
Any idea what the rationale is for the difference between the men's and women's rule?

The men's and women's rules makers don't want to work together. There is no good reason for most of the mens/womens differences.

BillyMac Sun Mar 18, 2012 02:12pm

'Nough Said ...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Camron Rust (Post 832853)
The men's and women's rules makers don't want to work together. There is no good reason for most of the mens/womens differences.

http://ts4.mm.bing.net/images/thumbn...3&index=newexp


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:50pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1