Rsbq

[Adam]

Originally Posted by tref

Although I'm thrilled that the concept of RSBQ & SDF is finally being applied at the HS level, but it seems as though its being applied or interpreted incorrectly.

RSBQ - Deals with a ball handler, generally on the perimeter.
SDF - Deals with a would-be shooter on drives to the basket, below the FT line extended.
Advantage/Disadvantage - Everything else falls under this, from the sound of the OP it doesnt seem like anyone was disadvantaged... play on!
Possession consequence or clean up - This applied to rebounding situations.

Sorry, but these are all just different ways of saying "advantage/disadvantage," which is just another way of wording 4-27-3.

[VaTerp]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

Sorry, but these are all just different ways of saying "advantage/disadvantage," which is just another way of wording 4-27-3.

Agree that they are all concepts born from advantage/disadvantage and 4-27-3.

But I don't see the need for the "sorry." These terms simply further break it down and make it easier for many to teach and understand application of 4.27.3 in relative situations. What's wrong with that?

[Adam]

Originally Posted by VaTerp

Agree that they are all concepts born from advantage/disadvantage and 4-27-3.

But I don't see the need for the "sorry." These terms simply further break it down and make it easier for many to teach and understand application of 4.27.3 in relative situations. What's wrong with that?

I just don't like (personal issue perhaps) the implication that RSBQ and SDF are somehow different concepts.

[VaTerp]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

I just don't like (personal issue perhaps) the implication that RSBQ and SDF are somehow different concepts.

Gotcha.

I see it as the same concept applied to different situations but realize that, for whatever reason, not everybody sees it that way.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by VaTerp

Gotcha.

I see it as the same concept applied to different situations but realize that, for whatever reason, not everybody sees it that way.

Agreed, but using the terms in contrast with one another leads to the perception that they're somehow fundamentally different. I'm probably being overly persnickety, though.