The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   What do you have (block/charge)? (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/87681-what-do-you-have-block-charge.html)

ballgame99 Mon Feb 06, 2012 01:12pm

What do you have (block/charge)?
 
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/Bn2PRN8BCvQ" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Me, I have a no call on the first (if no travel), and a charge on the second.

edit to add: IMO, no way you could call a defensive foul on the first one, its a charge or no call.

bainsey Mon Feb 06, 2012 01:18pm

Charge and charge.

Rich Mon Feb 06, 2012 01:21pm

PC on both. Great defense on the first one and substantial contact to the torso, IMO.

bob jenkins Mon Feb 06, 2012 01:24pm

charge, no call, charge, charge, charge, charge.

It's amazing how similar to each other the first three plays are, and how similar the last three plays are. ;)

Rich Mon Feb 06, 2012 01:27pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by bob jenkins (Post 820680)
charge, no call, charge, charge, charge, charge.

It's amazing how similar to each other the first three plays are, and how similar the last three plays are. ;)

Reminds me of the movie where one guy convinces a gullible guy to bet on the replay of a soccer goal and convinces him it's a new play.

HawkeyeCubP Mon Feb 06, 2012 01:29pm

1. That first play is a technically a travel - but it's the kind that doesn't get called on the men's side very often, in my limited experience of watching that side.

2. PC. Great defense and great call in an intense spot in the game. Wow.

Camron Rust Mon Feb 06, 2012 01:29pm

2nd one, obvious.

1st one looked embellished. Not sure that contact moved the defender as much as the defender made it look. He was going down no matter how much contact there was. It was close and from some angles it could look like a charge but I don't think I'd have a whistle on that one.

Sharpshooternes Mon Feb 06, 2012 02:20pm

1. Travel that I would have missed but would have called a charge.
2. Charge

I think we (officials in general, not necessarily you guys) penalize the defense way too much

Duffman Mon Feb 06, 2012 02:39pm

I def have a charge in number two, I actually was watching that live and rewound it to slow it down to take a second look.

The first looks like a no-call in every angle except for the camera on the floor in the leads corner. I sometimes struggle with this play, especially in situations like this. The offensive player has clearly tried to spin away from contact and the defense and the defensive players goal is clearly to draw the charge and not necessarily defend the rim. That said I also understand the argument of not penalizing the defense.

rockchalk jhawk Mon Feb 06, 2012 02:43pm

I am obviously a KU fan. I also missed the entire KU/MU game due to the fact that my own game that night tipped off at the exact same time that the KU/MU game did. Knowing that they lost and how they lost it (giving up an 11-0 run to end the game), I haven't had the heart to go watch highlights so this is the first footage I've seen from the game. I had heard quite a bit of grumbling from KU nation regarding the charge calls at the end of the game.

That being said, I'm not sure why people are pissing and moaning. Two pretty clear PC's in my opinion. *sigh*

Oh well, I didn't figure KU could pull this one out on the road anyways.

Adam Mon Feb 06, 2012 02:50pm

Both plays look like PC to me in live action. I can see maybe, from other angles, the second being a no-call. It looks to me like he went through the defender's space, including contact with the defender, so I'm not inclined to ignore it even if the defender started his reaction a bit early.

IMO the travel was after the contact on that first play, too.

Rich Mon Feb 06, 2012 02:50pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by HawkeyeCubP (Post 820683)
1. That first play is a technically a travel - but it's the kind that doesn't get called on the men's side very often, in my limited experience of watching that side.

2. PC. Great defense and great call in an intense spot in the game. Wow.

Yes, you're right. Spin move, replanted pivot. Again, I think because I'm told to look at the contact on the play, I never watched the feet.

Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. Mon Feb 06, 2012 05:12pm

As many of you know my Dear Mother is an KU alumus and I am a KU basketball fan and so my calls in both plays would have been:

CHARGE!! and CHARGE!!

MTD, Sr.

P.S. I know that isn't KU blue but is the best I could do. :(
I think the first one by the C was a great call and the second one was
an even easier one to make.

jearef Mon Feb 06, 2012 05:26pm

Charge and Charge.

Jeremy Hohn Mon Feb 06, 2012 05:35pm

No call and Charge.

JugglingReferee Mon Feb 06, 2012 05:49pm

PC and PC. That's without looking at the pivot feet.

JRutledge Mon Feb 06, 2012 05:49pm

PC fouls on both!!!

Peace

SamIAm Mon Feb 06, 2012 05:51pm

Full Disclosure - I am a KU fan and will be at the KU-Baylor game Wednesday.
(This year I got tickets early enough for the family to sit together. Mrs. SamIAm will appreciate that.)

Look at C's location when the contact occurs. Next to Mr. Self, and looking through two players. Regardless, from there it probably looked like a charge to the both C and Mr. Self as Mr. Self did not seem to complain.

twocentsworth Mon Feb 06, 2012 07:35pm

Don Daily (the calling official on both plays) got it right BOTH times....charge and charge.

There certainly was contact that created an advantage in both plays, so....

Ask yourself this question: "what did the defender do that was illegal?" OR "which player was responsible for/created the contact?"

eyezen Mon Feb 06, 2012 10:33pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by SamIAm (Post 820771)
Full Disclosure - I am a KU fan and will be at the KU-Baylor game Wednesday.
(This year I got tickets early enough for the family to sit together. Mrs. SamIAm will appreciate that.)

Look at C's location when the contact occurs. Next to Mr. Self, and looking through two players. Regardless, from there it probably looked like a charge to the both C and Mr. Self as Mr. Self did not seem to complain.

If you know who the C was on that play, you'd know that he doesn't look thru many players, especially guards out on the perimeter. ;)

SCalScoreKeeper Mon Feb 06, 2012 10:47pm

I've got a no call on the first one and a charge on #2.

HawkeyeCubP Tue Feb 07, 2012 12:18am

I challenge those of you saying "no call" for the first play to go look at it again and find the pivot foot.

APG Tue Feb 07, 2012 12:37am

Quote:

Originally Posted by HawkeyeCubP (Post 820844)
I challenge those of you saying "no call" for the first play to go look at it again and find the pivot foot.

They're saying no call in regards to the OP's question...block or charge. And that type of "technical" travel is not really called at that level.

And for the record, I'm punching it in both plays.

zm1283 Tue Feb 07, 2012 12:41am

I know no one will want to subject themselves to this cesspool, but KU's message board is hilarious to read. So much stupidity and complete lack of rules knowledge about these two plays.

HawkeyeCubP Tue Feb 07, 2012 12:48am

Quote:

Originally Posted by AllPurposeGamer (Post 820849)
And that type of "technical" travel is not really called at that level.

It consistently is, and has been hammered as POE since I bought my first NCAA book - just not on that side.;)

APG Tue Feb 07, 2012 12:54am

Quote:

Originally Posted by HawkeyeCubP (Post 820853)
It consistently is, and has been hammered as POE since I bought my first NCAA book - just not on that side.;)

Okay, at the major Division I men's basketball level, the technical travel on a lot of spins moves is no called quite a bit (in my observation). ;)

ILRef80 Tue Feb 07, 2012 01:01am

I no-call the first one. But, the floor angle from the lead's side makes me question my initial reaction because the contact was more significant than I thought live. But, to be honest, I would have probably no called this live.

The 2nd is a charge. Great defense and outstanding call.

Raymond Tue Feb 07, 2012 08:28am

Quote:

Originally Posted by ILRef80 (Post 820860)
I no-call the first one. But, the floor angle from the lead's side makes me question my initial reaction because the contact was more significant than I thought live. But, to be honest, I would have probably no called this live.

The 2nd is a charge. Great defense and outstanding call.

I think the first one is a PC but not from C's vantage point. The contact that was made was away from the C but easily seen by the Lead. So I would say it was the correct call but by the wrong official.

JugglingReferee Tue Feb 07, 2012 10:04am

On play #1, there's a travel at the beginning of the drive for not releasing the ball before the pivot foot is lifted, and I think there's a travel at the end of the drive as well for the pivot foot establishing a new point of contact with the floor prior to release. However, that may have occurred after the illegal contact.

For some reason, YouTube has been choppy this morning, so I didn't get the best look.

BillyMac Tue Feb 07, 2012 06:25pm

Finger Malfunction ...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by JugglingReferee (Post 820976)
For some reason, YouTube has been choppy this morning.

That's because everyone was looking on YouTube for MIA giving everyone in the United States the finger.

Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. Wed Feb 08, 2012 04:59pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by BillyMac (Post 821246)
That's because everyone was looking on YouTube for MIA giving everyone in the United States the finger.


Billy:

I resemble that remark. LOL

And speaking of resembling that remark, Junior and I were officiating a boys' 10U game last Saturday morning when someone in the stands yelled at me if I had a grandson playing for the other team. Junior and I couldn't stop laughing.

MTD, Sr.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:16pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1