Inbounds Play Deflection

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by Eastshire

Is correcting this error something we should be doing though? Some errors should be corrected if discovered later, e.g. a foul charged to the wrong player or a 3 counted as a 2 or vice versa. Some errors shouldn't be corrected if discovered later, e.g. a foul which wasn't a foul or a violation that wasn't a violation. Although, I sympathize with wanting to treat this as the former, it feels more like the latter to me.

If it's a warning which, by rule, shouldn't have been a warning, then fix it later -- treat it as a scorekeeper's error. Now, if there had been a second violation, and a T and FTs, it's too late to fix that.

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by mbyron

If an error is not a "correctable error," they infer that the error is not correctable.

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

It's an error, and it is correctable, but it's not a Correctable Error.

Do you guys ever listen to yourselves? If, five thousand years from now, an archaeologist discovers these statements in some cavern, they'll think that we're nuts.

[gdudik]

Originally Posted by BillyMac

Do you guys ever listen to yourselves? If, five thousand years from now, an archaeologist discovers these statements in some cavern, they'll think that we're nuts.

There would be footnotes at the bottom of the translated text explaining how the passage ought to be interpreted, taking into account cultural context, etc etc.

[Welpe]

Originally Posted by BillyMac

Do you guys ever listen to yourselves? If, five thousand years from now, an archaeologist discovers these statements in some cavern, they'll think that we're nuts.

Won't be a problem after Dec 21 of this year....