![]() |
Quote:
|
On these type of plays (rebounding plays) I've been told to only call a foul if:
1. There's possession consequence 2. To clean up rough play. |
Quote:
Quote:
When applied correctly, I don't think advantage/disadvantage or "seeing the whole play" is a double edged sword at all. |
Quote:
Doesn't sound like a foul to me. |
There is almost always going to be contact on rebounds, so I would probably have passed on the contact unless I felt they were giving a more difficult shot by the contact. We can talk philosophy on this all day, but unless I see the contact I really am not sure if you did the right thing. All I will say is this is a time to have a slow whistle, but I am not sure I would wait on an obvious foul just because to wait to see if the shot was made. If I have a rebounding foul, I probably would have called a foul way before the shot. Then again not seeing the play it is hard to say what was the right thing to do.
Peace |
And I'm, What You Call, Very Experienced ...
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Possible thread hijack:
Play: A1 attempts a two-handed, over-the-head crosscourt pass. As she releases the ball, B1 contacts her on the forearm with an open palm ("smack"). The pass is still released. If we paused the action right here, the official judges the contact to be incidental, especially given the level of play and the calls that night. Resume action. The pass floats, and B2 intercepts the pass. Question: Is it too late to go back and get a foul on B1? |
Quote:
In the OP, there is little chance to overcome the effects of the contact, so the contact is more scrutinized. In your case, the foul happened far from the basket, giving the new offensive player much time and space to do her thing. In addition, players have different momentum crossing the DL than they do jumping for a rebound. I guess what I'm saying is that RSBQ differs in the two plays. |
Quote:
This is where having played the game helps. Camps taught me to know where the ball is going (on a pass, who the intended receiver is, etc) and if illegal contact hinders that goal, then yes, grab the foul. When there is a smack as in your play bob, I think it's easier to call a foul, even if it's late. So yes, grab that foul. It wasn't incidental and shouldn't have been thought of that way in the first place. I think there are some fouls that in our heads, are delayed fouls. They're not immediately known to be incidental, or immediately known to have a whistle. We do wait a short amount of time to gather more information. I once saw one of the top college officials in my (ahem) state whistle a play down a good 1.5 seconds after the foul. It was 100% the right call, but just late. No a single person said anything to him. |
Quote:
If you are gathering information...and have not already "judged" incidental...you could probably "go back" and get the foul...one of those have to be there. Dave Libby told us at one of his camps..."have the courage to NOT CALL the foul, when the whole gym heard the slap". This was in relation to a lay-up...and probably just a slap on the hand. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Turnover, the play is over, slap caused a disadvantage... late whistle. Hits the mark, the play is now over, slap didnt cause a disadvantage... the clock runs. Never too late to get it right! |
I think in Bob's play, you have to decide whether the slap caused the turnover, or whether A1 happened to throw a bad pass after an incidental slap.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:22pm. |