Intentional Foul?
I'm pretty sure this was discussed previously but can't find the thread. Casebook situation 10.3.10C says:
Team A scores near the end of the fourth quarter and is trailing by one point. B1 has the ball and is moving along the end line to make the throw-in. A2 steps out of bounds and fouls B1. Is the foul personal or technical? RULING: This is an intentional personal foul. The time remaining to be played or whether Team A had been previously warned for a delay-of-game situation is not a factor. If the team had not been warned, the foul constitutes the warning. My question is this: If Team A had been given a DOG warning already wouldn't the reaching through the plane cause a technical whether or not contact followed (i.e., the reaching through causing the technical came first followed by contact, regardless of the amount of time between the two actions)? I understand the rule is what it is and will call it that way. This just struck me as curious and was wondering if I'm completely off base in my question. |
If it's all one act, then penalize that act, even if the laws of physics say the plane had to be broken before the contact was made.
If there's a reach (or step) across and then a second act to foul, get the first act. |
Thanks Bob, that helps.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:07am. |