Rule book and Case book correlation?
 

I have read the rulebook, casebook. Now I am in the process of reading each rule and comparing it to the casebook to help me understand the rules a little better. My question is does the rulebook and casebook have any correlation? For instance, if I look at the rulebook at rule 1-3-2 then look at the casebook 1.3.2 they are different. I would like to hear how ideas on how the two books are used together.

Thank you.

Look Again...
 

Yes, the casebook's citations do correlate with the rulebook's. Your example of 1-3-2 is an example when the note following Art. 2 is considered.

Basically, the casebook elaborates upon and illustrates situations in which the respective rule is enforced in the real world. Kinda. Reading through one and then the other seems less preferrable than how you're doing it now.

They go together.

The rule book is just that, a book containing the official rules of the game.
The casebook is a supplemental that is intended to help you navigate through most of the "really weird" situations that you'll potentially encounter in a game (and that have almost certainly been encountered by someone, somewhere, long before you got here).

Oftentimes, the casebook plays will reference several rules which must be combined to bring you to the approved ruling.


Using your example, rule 1-3-2 says this:
Pretty simple, right? All this rule does is specify the division line.

Here's the casebook play:
In other words: "The division line has several different sections to it that are different colors... is that legal?"
Answer: "yes, that's legal, as long as the line is clearly visible"

For the most part the case book follows in the same manner as the rule book...or close enough that after you read the case book play, you should be easily able to find the rule (as in 4-13-2 or any other rule the case book play example is usually 4.13.2 or somewhere near about).