The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   Its official (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/81684-its-official.html)

tref Mon Oct 03, 2011 11:34am

Its official
 
Although DI is the only level required to have the RA marked this season, all levels will adjudicate secondary defenders the same whether the floor is marked or not.

Calls that should be an absolute are going to be strictly judgement below DI & unfortunately help cannot be offered...

I smell trouble brewing!

JRutledge Mon Oct 03, 2011 11:45am

This rule was always a problem. That was illustrated by what I saw yesterday at a JC Jamboree. Many close plays that were very difficult to even see clearly.

Peace

tref Mon Oct 03, 2011 11:55am

Quote:

Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 791345)
This rule was always a problem. That was illustrated by what I saw yesterday at a JC Jamboree. Many close plays that were very difficult to even see clearly.

Peace

True, but under the rim (last season) was more clear cut as it was a smaller area. Either they were under the rim or they weren't. Looking forward to the challenge though!

JRutledge Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:09pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by tref (Post 791347)
True, but under the rim (last season) was more clear cut as it was a smaller area. Either they were under the rim or they weren't. Looking forward to the challenge though!

Yes, but that means the call will be just as difficult when you have to make a judgment based on image that cannot see clearly on the floor. The area did expand, but it will be even harder to split hairs either way without a marking. And I hope schools put this on the court, but I do not see a lot of schools having a RA on the court.

Peace

Raymond Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:17pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by tref (Post 791343)
...
I smell trouble brewing!

Wait til you have to explain to a coach why after a long rebound out to the 3-point line followed by a drive to the basket and a crash in the RA that the secondary defender rule doesn't apply in this situation. (A.R. 125 in the new case book for rule 4-61.3)

tref Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:22pm

IKR! Or why we are going the other way when A1 comes to a stop then jumps into B1 who is clearly in the RA.
Hopefully they actually watch the video...

JRutledge Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:31pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef (Post 791351)
Wait til you have to explain to a coach why after a long rebound out to the 3-point line followed by a drive to the basket and a crash in the RA that the secondary defender rule doesn't apply in this situation. (A.R. 125 in the new case book for rule 4-61.3)

I could be totally wrong, but something tells me that is not the intent of that rule or what they envisioned with that ruling. I think they want a closer rebound to eliminate that restriction. At least that is what the example in the Rules Video was showing. I hope they clear that up or use some better language in the future.

Peace

Raymond Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:42pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 791354)
I could be totally wrong, but something tells me that is not the intent of that rule or what they envisioned with that ruling. I think they want a closer rebound to eliminate that restriction. At least that is what the example in the Rules Video was showing. I hope they clear that up or use some better language in the future.

Peace

The rules video (with the players acting out scenarios) shows a rebound being tipped out towards the 3-point line followed by a drive to the basket and a crash w/i the RA. It's ruled a PC b/c there is no secondary defender/RA on this type of play. It's around the 25:40 mark of the video. The commentary says "tipped to a wing player". So I guess we would have to decide how far out a tip/rebound can go and determine "immediate drive to the basket".

tref Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:51pm

Art. 3. After an offensive rebound, there are no secondary defenders when the rebounder makes an immediate move to the basket.

I dont think it matters how far the rebound travels, an immediate move to the basket is the key here.

Scrapper1 Mon Oct 03, 2011 01:39pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by tref (Post 791363)
Art. 3. After an offensive rebound, there are no secondary defenders when the rebounder makes an immediate move to the basket.

I dont think it matters how far the rebound travels, an immediate move to the basket is the key here.

Terrible. Just adopt the NBA rule all the way. Widen the lane, mark the LDB and make a 4' arc. All this pussyfooting around is dumb. We all know what they want, so just DO it.

tref Mon Oct 03, 2011 01:43pm

Sounds like a new Nike commercial! Got an agent Scrapper1?

APG Mon Oct 03, 2011 01:55pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scrapper1 (Post 791369)
Terrible. Just adopt the NBA rule all the way. Widen the lane, mark the LDB and make a 4' arc. All this pussyfooting around is dumb. We all know what they want, so just DO it.

Exactly...it's like they don't want to go all in on the rule.

Scrapper1 Mon Oct 03, 2011 01:56pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by tref (Post 791371)
Sounds like a new Nike commercial! Got an agent Scrapper1?

Actually, I'd probably need a lawyer for copyright infringement or something if Nike ever saw that post.

JRutledge Mon Oct 03, 2011 02:52pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef (Post 791358)
The rules video (with the players acting out scenarios) shows a rebound being tipped out towards the 3-point line followed by a drive to the basket and a crash w/i the RA. It's ruled a PC b/c there is no secondary defender/RA on this type of play. It's around the 25:40 mark of the video. The commentary says "tipped to a wing player". So I guess we would have to decide how far out a tip/rebound can go and determine "immediate drive to the basket".

I agree this could cause some confusion without a doubt. If you brought it up I am sure others will make similar observations. The ball was not quite as far away from the basket as you said, then again, there are not going to be two or three players on the court and there is likely going to be other defenders on the way to the basket.

And the more I think about it, I could see more schools with this marking if they play at their own facility. The three point line changed a few years ago and everyone had that in place. I would think this is a smaller area to deal with; it is just a matter of desire to have the marking more than anything.

Peace

Mark Padgett Mon Oct 03, 2011 03:26pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scrapper1 (Post 791376)
Actually, I'd probably need a lawyer for copyright infringement or something if Nike ever saw that post.

Since I have friends at Nike, I could forward your post. However, for a modest financial consideration, I could forget I ever saw it. Just message me your debit card number and PIN. Thanks. :cool:


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:54am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1