![]() |
ESPN
Callahan Bball no pass word needed Ok I might not know my Men's College teams- but I'll give you a run for your moneny with the Women! Go to ESPN Fantasy- look to the right for the Women's Challenge I'll enter the men tourney as well Stewcall in Virginia no longer a Rookie! |
Quote:
|
Can you believe that they move the Women's Championship Game to Tuesday night?
|
Quote:
|
Pick the higher seeds.
Here is a Women's Tournament tip.
For the first two rounds, you cannot go wrong with picking all the top seeds. Very seldom does a top seed lose in the first and second round. It did happen last year, but this was the first time a #16 seed beat a #1 seed. And you can almost guarantee that 3 of the top seeds will make the Final Four. The trick is just which one do you leave out? Peace |
On the subject, I see in the local paper that the folks in Ruston (LA Tech) were somewhat miffed by their #5 seed. This is not my area of expertise, but doing the math:
#6(?) ranking <b>in the country</b>, #5 ranking in the region, there seems to be a bit of a crack. Somebody knowledgeable have an opinion? |
RPI Rankings.
Quote:
Peace |
Quote:
<b>Lee (Toledo, OH): How does the 6th ranked team in the country, Louisiana Tech, 29-2, only get a 5 seed in the West region? They should be at least a 3 seed if not higher. Cheryl Marra: One thing that is important to note, your SOS is very significant. La. Tech did not have a particulary strong SOS to compliment their win/loss record. That was taken into consideration by the committee. That had a lot to do with the non-conference scheduling. </b> And also of interest: <b>Fahrunnisa (Los Olivos, CA): Why is UCSB seeded so low (7) when they're number 17 in both AP and ESPN polls? Cheryl Marra: I think you need to remember that we don't use polls. We do look at SOS and win/loss records and significant wins. We don't look at polls when we make our decision. </b> SOS = strength of schedule |
Quote:
Chuck |
Quote:
This year, they went with "predetermined sites". They picked out 16 sites ahead of time, home courts for 16 pretty good teams. Now they all host, even if they aren't a 1, 2, 3, or 4. There are some 5's, 6's, and even down to 10's hosting in the first round. I think there might be a couple of 2's that would play second-round away games. Expect more "upsets" based on the seeding this year. Really bad system, IMHO. |
I'm there man!
|
I guess I know the women's game a bit better than the men's! Only one wrong pick so far! My men's bracket I might as well burn!
|
I missed only two.
Quote:
Peace |
...aahhh, but there were a couple of games that didn't follow the top seed format! But you are right, the difference between the haves and have nots in the women's side is much greater..
|
Can't find an RPI for women, but
LA Tech is in the WAC, not a lot of strength there. On the other hand, they beat Texas Tech who was 7th ranked and got a 2 seed. I guess it's one of those things you have to live with when you play in a mid-major.
Also, didn't LA Tech's coach blast the committee last year? Claimed a gender bias, putting all the male coaches in one region to ensure three women coaches in final four. Maybe a little vengeance this time around by the powers that be. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:35am. |