Quote:
|
Quote:
More importantly, they will have to be dead-on accurate with their closest spots. In the past, awarding a FC throw-in when it should have been a BC throw-in was no big deal. Now it is, in a big way. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Rule 4-3 Art. 2. A team’s front court shall consist of that part of the playing court between its end line and the nearer edge of the division line, including its basket and the inbounds part of its backboard. At least it's that way in the NCAA rule book. So there is no need for an exception. The NFHS just needs to define the front court in the rule book. But as it stands I see nothing in the NFHS rule or case book that tells us to have a 3-second count during a front court throw-in. |
Quote:
I was working the assumption that if there's TC on a TI, then an inbounding pass from FC to BC is illegal. This is how it works in FIBA. I've also learned that many officials have to make up the closest spot when they don't identify the throw-in spot with prelim signal. After the fact spot identification; sometimes they're close, sometimes not. If they're not close, it exists assigning the TI to the wrong "court". And any official worth his game fee will not get this stuff wrong. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I believe only FIBA and the NBA do not allow frontcourt throw-ins to be thrown into the backcourt and even the NBA allows that in the final two minutes of the 4th/OT. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I'm curious, though, how they're going to handle 9-1-3, in-bounding a ball to a teammate who jumps from the frontcourt, catches, and lands in the backcourt. I see a few words there that may need to be changed.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
See NCAA rules 4-3-5 & 9-9-1(a). Those were the exceptions the NCAA had to add. |
Quote:
I agree that certain exceptions are needed in regards to front/back court status for tipped balls and players who leave their feet. |
Quote:
The same situation applies to the 10 second BC violation. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:27pm. |