Help

[RandyBrown]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

And that's your whole problem outlined quite nicely right there. You want to discuss something that you absolutely nothing about.

There is no advantage/disadvantage involved. You call the freaking rule the way it was written and the way the rulesmakers want it called. And you learn the rules by asking questions and then accepting the damn answers. Especially when the damn answers are backed up by rules citations. It's not our fault that you don't understand those rules citations; it's your's! You'll never learn a damn thing until you realize that.

I'll say it one last time: I agree with you on the rules as written. The advantage/disadvantage judgment is subjective--yours is as valid as another's. This discussion, which I instigated, has nothing to do with me accepting answers. It was instigated by me as food for thought for all--not as a, "Hey, Jurassic, how do you want me to handle this one?" Got it? Yours is not the only voice I want to hear, here.