The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 13, 2002, 02:15pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 2,217
In several other sports, we regularly watch athletes who are younger than LeBron James. Gymnastics and figure skating are often cited (and laughed at as quasi sports), but you can also include tennis, soccer, swimming - we frequently have world class performers who are below age 18. Pele was starring in, and winning, the World Cup at 17. Santino Quaranta made the DC United roster at 16 or 17 years old.

Just because we are not accustomed to seeing this in basketball, why is it so wrong to watch a great player perform? The McDonald HS All Stars tour and play in major arenas in large cities. We have the DeMatha invitational at the MCI Center in DC, and it brings in top talent from around the country. What gives with the resistance to this concept? If he can play (and he can), lets watch and enjoy while we can. And to see him against (arguably) the best collection of HS talent in the country is the best test of all, and well worth putting on TV.
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:02pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1