![]() |
Quote:
None of us really gives a damn about any of that. We officiate. We worry about what happens between those lines on the floor. Everything else is just freaking details. And we really don't care about timer/scorers either unless they screw up. And if one of 'em does, well, then there's always another chseagle available somewhere to plug in. I hate to break it to you but we could probably teach an orangutang to do what you do. And that includes security too. It might be a damn good idea also. Orangutangs don't talk as much as freaking chseagles, and when they do they usually make more sense. |
Quote:
Major league franchises have the money to have such sophisticated systems. |
Quote:
There's throwing suggestions, then there's throwing unrealistic ideas that don't even make sense. Guess which yours fit in. |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Tell you what, why don't you quit polluting all of our OFFICIATING threads with your scoreboard/timekeeper/shotclock/guardianofthegameandallthatisholy nonsense that nobody really gives two rat turds about? It's getting old and I'm tired of biting me tongue over it. :mad: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I feel a lot better now. ;)
And you know that doesn't work if everybody quotes him, ergo the troll in the baseball forum. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Both of you are aware you're goin' to he!!, right?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Getting back to proposed rule changes
Gee - I think that's what this thread was about some time in a past life. How about this one:
If an official stops play due to an injured player, that player must leave and be substituted even if the coach is not beckoned, or that team must use a TO to keep the player in the game. IOW - just eliminate the "coach being beckoned" aspect of the current rule. I know there would be some issues if this came to pass, but it could be fun to discuss it. BTW - I really don't care how this would affect table personnel. ;) |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:52am. |