The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   ESPN TOurnament Challenge (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/63992-espn-tournament-challenge.html)

JugglingReferee Mon Mar 14, 2011 11:13am

Here it is:

ParaChat.com - Join a Free Chat Room or Get Your Own Free Chat Room

JugglingReferee Mon Mar 14, 2011 11:15am

Notes:
  • Java required
  • no website registration required
  • username required before entering room

mbyron Mon Mar 14, 2011 11:21am

Quote:

Originally Posted by grunewar (Post 739762)
How about the chat room? :D

Or a sticky chat room?

Adam Mon Mar 14, 2011 11:23am

Quote:

Originally Posted by mbyron (Post 739771)
Or a sticky chat room?

Hey, this is a family friendly forum.

rockyroad Mon Mar 14, 2011 11:26am

Quote:

Originally Posted by mbyron (Post 739771)
Or a sticky chat room?

That's gross.

rockyroad Mon Mar 14, 2011 11:28am

So what is up with a couple of those play-in teams coming in at a #11 and a #12 seed? Anyone hear the explanation behind that?

mbyron Mon Mar 14, 2011 11:33am

Quote:

Originally Posted by rockyroad (Post 739778)
So what is up with a couple of those play-in teams coming in at a #11 and a #12 seed? Anyone hear the explanation behind that?

Yes, it's to make sure that Duke gets Hampton in the "second" (which is to say, first) round, and keep Georgetown guessing. :D

grunewar Mon Mar 14, 2011 11:34am

Quote:

Originally Posted by rockyroad (Post 739778)
So what is up with a couple of those play-in teams coming in at a #11 and a #12 seed? Anyone hear the explanation behind that?

Ask the Committee, they can rationalize it ALL! :rolleyes:

tjones1 Mon Mar 14, 2011 11:41am

I got my picks locked in last night!

I will not be available for chat for Round 1 and Round 2 as I will be watching in Vegas. I should be in chat for the rest of the tournament though!

M&M Guy Mon Mar 14, 2011 11:42am

Quote:

Originally Posted by rockyroad (Post 739778)
So what is up with a couple of those play-in teams coming in at a #11 and a #12 seed? Anyone hear the explanation behind that?

Those are the at-large "last 4 in". So they're from the major or mid-major conferences, and last year they would've been the last 4 left out. So, in effect, they're still considered "better" than some of the automatic qualifiers that are considered #16 seeds, that's why they still get a #11 or #12.

So, we won't get the automatic #1 vs. #16 anymore, until #16 wins one of these first round games.

Scrapper1 Mon Mar 14, 2011 11:45am

Quote:

Originally Posted by rockyroad (Post 739778)
So what is up with a couple of those play-in teams coming in at a #11 and a #12 seed? Anyone hear the explanation behind that?

The explanation I heard is that they did not want to put 8 of the lowest conference champions in those play-in games. So they put the 4 lowest conference champions against the "last 4" at-large teams to make it in the tournament.

Why the winner ends up as an 11 or 12 seed, I do not know.

Adam Mon Mar 14, 2011 11:45am

Still doesn't make sense. Bringing in 4 new teams, you could still bump seeding to the point where your play-in teams are all playing for a 16 seed. Making an 11 play an extra game while not doing it to a 16 seems to defeat the purpose of seeding; at least partially.

mbyron Mon Mar 14, 2011 11:48am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snaqwells (Post 739796)
Still doesn't make sense. Bringing in 4 new teams, you could still bump seeding to the point where your play-in teams are all playing for a 16 seed. Making an 11 play an extra game while not doing it to a 16 seems to defeat the purpose of seeding; at least partially.

I thought the point was to give the 1 seed a cupcake.

I think they should have had the remaining 5 Big East teams play each other for a spot or two. Not enough Big East in the dance. :D

M&M Guy Mon Mar 14, 2011 11:57am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snaqwells (Post 739796)
Still doesn't make sense. Bringing in 4 new teams, you could still bump seeding to the point where your play-in teams are all playing for a 16 seed. Making an 11 play an extra game while not doing it to a 16 seems to defeat the purpose of seeding; at least partially.

Now that I see the braket, I see what they did. 2 of the first 4 games (Tues. and Wed.) have 2 #16's playing each other, with the winners still being a #16, playing a #1 on Thurs. or Fri. 2 #11's play each other, then move into the #6 vs. #11 game, and 2 #12's play each other, with the winner moving into the #5 vs. #12 game.

So it's not like a #16 becomes a # 11 if they win. The seeds still carry over correctly into the Thurs. and Fri. games.

Adam Mon Mar 14, 2011 12:05pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by M&M Guy (Post 739803)
Now that I see the braket, I see what they did. 2 of the first 4 games (Tues. and Wed.) have 2 #16's playing each other, with the winners still being a #16, playing a #1 on Thurs. or Fri. 2 #11's play each other, then move into the #6 vs. #11 game, and 2 #12's play each other, with the winner moving into the #5 vs. #12 game.

So it's not like a #16 becomes a # 11 if they win. The seeds still carry over correctly into the Thurs. and Fri. games.

So, again, you've got two 11s and two 12s who have to play an extra game while two 16s do not. Still stupid.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:05pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1