The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 04, 2011, 09:41am
Aleve Titles to Others
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: East Westchester of the Southern Conference
Posts: 5,381
Send a message via AIM to 26 Year Gap
Angry

It perpetuates the myth. I don't even use the phrase in conversation. I've seen guys use it, too, and it bugs the crap out of me. Wish they'd have to forfeit their game fee if they do that.
__________________
Never hit a piñata if you see hornets flying out of it.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 04, 2011, 09:47am
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,700
Quote:
Originally Posted by 26 Year Gap View Post
It perpetuates the myth. I don't even use the phrase in conversation. I've seen guys use it, too, and it bugs the crap out of me. Wish they'd have to forfeit their game fee if they do that.
The conversation bothers me more because it suggests they clearly do not understand the rule. Then again I do not see anyone giving that signal very often if ever.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 04, 2011, 09:55am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 115
I haven't seen that 'mechanic' yet, but I did see a "gator chomp" (like Florida Gators fans do) last week in a game I was watching. Not sure what it was supposed to mean. The offending action was blocked from my view.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 04, 2011, 09:59am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,341
Quote:
Originally Posted by BBrules View Post
I haven't seen that 'mechanic' yet, but I did see a "gator chomp" (like Florida Gators fans do) last week in a game I was watching. Not sure what it was supposed to mean. The offending action was blocked from my view.
It usually means that "the ball was blocked; it's not a foul."

Don't use it.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 04, 2011, 10:06am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 115
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins View Post
It usually means that "the ball was blocked; it's not a foul."

Don't use it.
Thank you for the clarification, Bob, and I won't!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 04, 2011, 10:08am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Usa
Posts: 943
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins View Post
It usually means that "the ball was blocked; it's not a foul."

Don't use it.
When I have a partner who is in the habit of using that signal, or the 'foul tip' mechanic in a shooting situation, I routinely reach across and call a shooting foul. Cures them pretty quick.
__________________
Prettys Womans in your city
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 04, 2011, 10:15am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 173
or the 'foul tip' mechanic in a shooting situation,

what is this?
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 04, 2011, 10:21am
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,700
Quote:
Originally Posted by BBrules View Post
I haven't seen that 'mechanic' yet, but I did see a "gator chomp" (like Florida Gators fans do) last week in a game I was watching. Not sure what it was supposed to mean. The offending action was blocked from my view.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins View Post
It usually means that "the ball was blocked; it's not a foul."

Don't use it.
I am not sure I totally agree with that. For one the chop signal is for clarification and to give information. The "over the back" signal is to call something based on something that is not a rule. We used to use the "kicking" signal and it was not approved (even the "palming" signal was used and not approved at one time). And I know officials that use the "tip" signal for multiple purposes to give information. I am not advocating using this signal, but just saying that we do a lot of things that are not approved and no one gets upset over the situation.

To be clear I would not use that signal during most live ball or right as a player is being defended, but I have used it before. Never been told not to or it was wrong.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 04, 2011, 10:24am
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,807
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge View Post
I am not sure I totally agree with that. For one the chop signal is for clarification and to give information. The "over the back" signal is to call something based on something that is not a rule. We used to use the "kicking" signal and it was not approved (even the "palming" signal was used and not approved at one time). And I know officials that use the "tip" signal for multiple purposes to give information. I am not advocating using this signal, but just saying that we do a lot of things that are not approved and no one gets upset over the situation.

To be clear I would not use that signal during most live ball or right as a player is being defended, but I have used it before. Never been told not to or it was wrong.

Peace
I've seen big time NCAA officials put both arms straight up and bring them forward/down to show that a player was vertical but brought the arms forward/down and fouled the shooter. It's a mechanic that may not be approved but communicates the foul far better than a hit/hack mechanic ever could.

Same with the hit to the head (in an NFHS game). If I hit the head, nobody ever questions me. If I use the usual hit/hack mechanic, I'm just as likely to hear from a coach that "he didn't hit him on the arm."

I try to use proper mechanics when they fit, but I'm not a slave to them 100% of the time, either.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 04, 2011, 11:28am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Posts: 307
Quote:
Originally Posted by justacoach View Post
When I have a partner who is in the habit of using that signal, or the 'foul tip' mechanic in a shooting situation, I routinely reach across and call a shooting foul. Cures them pretty quick.
I hope I haven't misunderstood what you are advocating here.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Interesting "over the back" discussion harmbu Basketball 8 Fri Feb 27, 2009 11:16am
NCAA back court rule - meaning of "caused the ball" bearclause Basketball 3 Fri Feb 06, 2009 04:47pm
ABC's "Nightline" examines "worst calls ever" tonight pizanno Basketball 27 Fri Jul 04, 2008 06:08am
Over and Back by stepping out of "bounds" Loudwhistle Basketball 49 Sat Jan 05, 2008 12:50am
Illegal Blocks "in the back" Rich Football 14 Mon Oct 09, 2006 01:56pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:03am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1