Tweets about ref lands coach in hot h20

[grunewar]

Originally Posted by AllPurposeGamer

What does that mean?

Maybe the basket came after the buzzer. But, did the try leave the player's hands before the buzzer?

[RobbyinTN]

Originally Posted by grunewar

Maybe the basket came after the buzzer. But, did the try leave the player's hands before the buzzer?

But depending on how you read the OP

Originally Posted by Larks

TV replays showed that Derek Willis' basket came after the buzzer, meaning the game should have gone to a second overtime.

....I took it to mean the shot left the player's hand AFTER the buzzer. If that is the case, it should not have counted but still doesn't justify his actions.

[Eastshire]

Originally Posted by RobbyinTN

But depending on how you read the OP



....I took it to mean the shot left the palyer's hand AFTER the buzzer. If that is the case, it should not have counted but still doesn't justify his actions.

Sure that's likely what it means, just sloppy reporting.

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by RobbyinTN

But depending on how you read the OP



....I took it to mean the shot left the player's hand AFTER the buzzer. If that is the case, it should not have counted but still doesn't justify his actions.

Originally Posted by Eastshire

Sure that's likely what it means, just sloppy reporting.

Or whoever consulted the TV Replay before the Twitter comments were made doesn't know the rules. That's just as likely.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

Or whoever consulted the TV Replay before the Twitter comments were made doesn't know the rules. That's just as likely.

Maybe, but chances are the coach knows a shot doesn't have to go in before the horn. My money is on sloppy writing.